Methodological Problems with the Academic Sources of Popular Psychology

Regular price €107.99
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
A01=Robert Ausch
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
Author_Robert Ausch
automatic-update
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=JMB
causes and correlations
COP=United States
critical psychology
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
effects of parenting
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Language_English
Null Hypothesis Significance Testing
PA=Available
Pop Psychology
positive psychology
Price_€100 and above
PS=Active
psychological measurement
psychological methods
psychology of the unconscious
softlaunch

Product details

  • ISBN 9781498524148
  • Weight: 531g
  • Dimensions: 157 x 239mm
  • Publication Date: 19 Feb 2016
  • Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Hardback
  • Language: English
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns
Methodological Problems with the Academic Sources of Popular Psychology: Context, Inference, and Measurementexamines the relationship between academic and popular psychology from a critical perspective with a focus on issues of methodology. The monograph traces the path from ideas in reputable popular psychology back to the original academic research tradition from which the claims were generated. It also addresses the conceptual and methodological controversies with respect to the original research typically ignored or played down in popular writing. This book covers a range of topics including the question of universal biases in judgment, resurgent notions of “fast” thinking and a cognitive unconscious, the psychology of happiness and other “positive” psychologies, the effects of parenting on child outcomes, and more general issues related to psychological tests and measures. The methodological problems that emerge include problems with generalizing from specific experimental conditions, highly biased sampling, lack of replication of findings, lack of shared referents across subfields, even different authors, as well as confusion around basic statistical and mathematical issues. Methodological Problems with the Academic Sources of Popular Psychology: Context, Inference, and Measurementreviews these issues extensively, offering both a sense of the history and pervasiveness of these issues in the field itself and an opportunity to review and master these difficult ideas.
Robert Ausch is assistant professor at New York University.

More from this author