Mind the Gap

Regular price €61.50
Quantity:
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
A01=Jos Vaessen
A01=Phillip Allman
Abstracts Screened
Action Formation Mechanism
Author_Jos Vaessen
Author_Phillip Allman
Category=JP
Comprehensive Community Initiatives
Context Mechanism Outcome Configurations
disciplinary knowledge integration
Epis Temological
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Evaluation Capacity Development
evaluation competencies for researchers
Evaluative Knowledge
evidence-based policy analysis
Frans L. Leeuw
HDI
Induced Technological Change
Jos Vaessen
Lisa Birch
middle
Middle Range Theory
Middle Range Theory Building
National Evaluation Experiences
National Opinion Research Center
National UK Scheme
Nick Tilley
Nicoletta Stame
Performance Measurement Policy
program theory evaluation
Public Administration
public policy assessment
range
Rational Actor Theories
Ray Pawson
Realist Evaluation Approach
Realist Synthesis Approach
Reference Group Theory
Reference Groups Behavior
Robert Picciotto
Robert Schwartz
Sandra Speer
social science evaluation
Social Science Research
Social Science Theory
Steve Jacob
theory
transdisciplinary research methods
Young Men

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138512221
  • Weight: 453g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 06 Oct 2017
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Over the past twenty to thirty years, evaluation has become increasingly important to the field of public policy. The number of people involved and specializing in evaluation has also increased markedly. Evidence of this trend can be found in the International Atlas of Evaluation, the establishment of new journals and evaluation societies, and the increase in systems of evaluation. Increasingly, the main reference point has become an assessment of the merit and value of interventions as such rather than the evaluator's disciplinary background. This growing importance of evaluation as an activity has also led to an increasing demand for the type of competencies evaluators should have.

Evaluation began as a niche area within the social and behavioral sciences. It subsequently became linked to policy research and analysis, and has, more recently, become trans-disciplinary. This volume demonstrates an association between the evaluation tradition in a particular country or policy field and the nature of the relationship between social and behavioral science research and evaluative practice. This book seeks to offer comprehensive data, which lead to conclusions about patterns that transcend the gap between evaluation and the social scientific disciplines.

Mind the Gap has a twofold aim. The first is to highlight and characterize the gap between evaluation practices and debates, and the substantive knowledge debates within the social and behavioral sciences. The second is to show why this gap is problematic for the practice of evaluation, while at the same time illustrating possible ways to build bridges. The book is centered on the value of producing useful evaluations grounded in social science theory and research.

More from this author