Moral Enhancement and the Public Good

Regular price €51.99
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
A01=Parker Crutchfield
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
Author_Parker Crutchfield
automatic-update
bioethics debate
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=HPQ
Category=JBFV
Category=JFM
Category=PSAD
Category=QDTQ
Climate Change
cognitive enhancement
Collective Risk
Comparable Moral Significance
compulsory enhancement
COP=United Kingdom
Covert Administration
covert moral bioenhancement policy
Covert Program
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
Enhancement Distinction
Epistemic Burdens
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_science
eq_society-politics
future generations responsibility
Gradable Adjectives
Information Withholding
Language_English
Mere Persons
Minor Intrusions
Moral Bioenhancement
Moral capacities
Moral Enhancement
Morally Permissible
neuroethics
Nonidentity Cases
Nonidentity Problem
PA=Available
Person's Moral Reasoning
Person’s Moral Reasoning
Price_€20 to €50
PS=Active
Public Goods Game
public health ethics
Public Health Interventions
Rational Irrationality
Reflection Problem
Relevant Comparison Class
Social inequalities
softlaunch
Ultimate Harm

Product details

  • ISBN 9781032020860
  • Weight: 340g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 09 Oct 2024
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
  • Language: English
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Currently, humans lack the cognitive and moral capacities to prevent the widespread suffering associated with collective risks, like pandemics, climate change, or even asteroids. In Moral Enhancement and the Public Good, Parker Crutchfield argues for the controversial and initially counterintuitive claim that everyone should be administered a substance that makes us better people. Furthermore, he argues that it should be administered without our knowledge. That is, moral bioenhancement should be both compulsory and covert. Crutchfield demonstrates how our duty to future generations and our epistemic inability to promote the public good highlight the need for compulsory, covert moral bioenhancement. This not only gives us the best chance of preventing widespread suffering, compared to other interventions (or doing nothing), it also best promotes liberty, autonomy, and equality. In a final chapter, Crutchfield addresses the most salient objections to his argument.

Parker Crutchfield is Associate Professor in Medical Ethics, Humanities, and Law at Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine. He writes in bioethics and epistemology, teaches medical ethics to medical students and resident physicians, and provides clinical ethics consultations.

More from this author