Moral Reality and the Empirical Sciences

Regular price €56.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Thomas Polzler
Adaptation Hypothesis
anti-realism
Author_Thomas Polzler
Category=QDTQ
causal influence
causal necessity
Causal Sufficiency
Co-occurrence Hypothesis
cultural anthropology
Disagreement Hypothesis
empirical moral disagreement
empirical sciences
empirical tests of moral realism
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
evolution of morality
evolutionary biology
Evolutionary Debunking Argument
evolutionary ethics
experimental philosophy
folk metaethics
folk moral realism
Fundamental Moral Disagreement
Hume's Law
Hume’s Law
Impoverished Stimuli
metaethical theories
metaethics
Moral Disagreement
moral emotions
moral judgements
moral judgment research
Moral Judgments
moral projectivism
moral psychology
Moral Realism
Moral Semantics
moral truths
Morally Permissible
neuroscience
neuroscience of morality
Non-moral Beliefs
non-naturalism
Non-naturalist Moral Realism
Objective Moral Facts
Objective Moral Properties
Objective Moral Truths
Phenomenal Conservatism
Philosophical Moral Psychology
Presumptive Argument
projectivism
projectivist argument
psychology
Replaceability Hypothesis
scientific moral psychology
sentimentalist argument
Thomas Polzler
Trolley Dilemma
Ultimatum Game
Widespread Moral Disagreement

Product details

  • ISBN 9780367734657
  • Weight: 453g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 18 Dec 2020
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Are there objective moral truths (things that are morally right or wrong independently of what anybody thinks about them)? To answer this question more and more scholars have recently begun to appeal to evidence from scientific disciplines such as psychology, neuroscience, biology, and anthropology. This book investigates this novel scientific approach in a comprehensive, empirically focused, partly clarificatory, and partly metatheoretical way. It argues for two main theses. First, it is possible for the empirical sciences to contribute to the moral realism/anti-realism debate. And second, most appeals to science that have so far been proposed are insufficiently empirically substantiated.

The book’s main chapters address four prominent science-based arguments for or against the existence of objective moral truths: the presumptive argument, the argument from moral disagreement, the sentimentalist argument, and the evolutionary debunking argument. For each of these arguments Thomas Pölzler first identifies the sense in which its underlying empirical hypothesis would have to be true in order for the argument to work. Then he shows that the available scientific evidence fails to support this hypothesis. Finally, he also makes suggestions as to how to test the hypothesis more validly in future scientific research.

Moral Reality and the Empirical Sciences is an important contribution to the moral realism/anti-realism debate that will appeal both to philosophers and scientists interested in moral psychology and metaethics.

Thomas Pölzler is a post-doctoral researcher and lecturer in the Department of Philosophy at the University of Graz, Austria. He mainly works on moral psychology and metaethics. His articles have been published in journals such as Synthese, Review of Philosophy and Psychology, and South African Journal of Philosophy.

More from this author