Moral Status of Combatants

Regular price €55.99
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
A01=Michael Skerker
Asymmetry Thesis
Author_Michael Skerker
Category=GTU
Category=JPWS
Category=JW
Category=QDTQ
Collective Moral Responsibilities
collective moral responsibility
collective violence theory
combatants
contractualist ethics
contractualist theory
Contributory Actions
Culpable Attacker
Defensive Harm
Defensive Rights
Defensive Violence
Deployment Orders
egalitarian norms in conflict
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Forced Choice Scenarios
Hypothetical Consent
Institutional Rights
just war
liability in warfare
Main Strategic Thrust
Michael Walzer
Military Norms
military responsibility
moral equality
Noncombatant
noncombatant immunity
philosophical analysis of war ethics
Proportionality Calculation
Psychotic Attacker
Reductive Individualists
revisionists
SCO
Security Standard
Service Member
Strong Moral Reasons
Unjust Side
Unjust Threat
Unjust War

Product details

  • ISBN 9780367521080
  • Weight: 453g
  • Dimensions: 156 x 234mm
  • Publication Date: 29 Jan 2024
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

This book develops a new contractualist foundation for just war theory, which defends the traditional view of the moral equality of combatants and associated egalitarian moral norms.

Traditionally it has been viewed that combatants on both sides of a war have the same right to fight, irrespective of the justice of their cause, and both sides must observe the same restrictions on the use of force, especially prohibitions on targeting noncombatants. Revisionist philosophers have argued that combatants on the unjust side of a war have no right to fight, that pro-war civilians on the unjust side might be targetable, and that lawful combatants on the unjust side might in principle be liable to prosecution for their participation on the unjust side. This book seeks to undercut the revisionist project and defend the traditional view of the moral equality of combatants. It does so by showing how revisionist philosophers fail to build a strong foundation for their arguments and misunderstand that there is a moral difference between collective military violence and a collection of individually unjustified violent actions. Finally, the book develops a theory defending the traditional view of military ethics based on a universal duty of all people to support just institutions.

This book will be of much interest to students of just war theory, ethics philosophy, and war studies.

Michael Skerker is an Associate Professor in the Leadership, Ethics, and Law Department at the US Naval Academy. The views in this book are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect those of the US Naval Academy, the Department of the Navy, or any branch of the US Government.

More from this author