Myth of Bureaucratic Neutrality

Regular price €67.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Domonic A. Bearfield
A01=Nicole Humphrey
A01=Shannon K. Portillo
administrative equity
American Public Administration
Antidiscrimination Laws
Author_Domonic A. Bearfield
Author_Nicole Humphrey
Author_Shannon K. Portillo
Bureaucratic Neutrality
Category=JBSL
Category=JP
Category=JPP
Category=KJU
Civil Rights Era
Civil Service Merit System
Council Manager Form
eq_bestseller
eq_business-finance-law
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
equity in government institutions
Field's Understanding
Field’s Understanding
heteronormativity in governance
historical policy analysis
institutional discrimination
Langley Air Force Base
Lavender Scare
LGBTQ
LGBTQ Community
LGBTQ Identity
LGBTQ Individual
Merit System
Pendleton Act
Politics Administration Dichotomy
Professional Accountability
Progressive Era
Public Administration
Public Administration Research
Public Administration Scholars
public sector diversity
race gender bias
Representative Bureaucracy Theory
Vice Versa
Welfare Reform
Workplace Incivility

Product details

  • ISBN 9781032345604
  • Weight: 260g
  • Dimensions: 138 x 216mm
  • Publication Date: 21 Jul 2022
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

In a system discredited by political corruption, the notion of ‘bureaucratic neutrality’ was presented during the Progressive era as strategy to restore legitimacy in government. However, bureaucratic neutrality also served as a barrier to equity in government. This book argues that neutrality is a myth that has been used as a means to oppress marginalized communities, largely disconnected from its origins within the field of public administration. A historical perspective of how the field has understood race and gender demonstrates how it has centered whiteness, masculinity, and heteronormativity in research and administrative practices, mistaking them for neutrality in public service.

Using a historically grounded positionality approach, the authors trace the myth of bureaucratic neutrality back to its origins and highlight how it has institutionalized inequity, both legally and culturally. Ultimately, the authors demonstrate that the only way to move toward equity is to understand how inequity has become institutionalized, and to constantly work to improve our systems and decision making.

With constituents across the globe demanding institutional changes in government that will establish new practices and mediate generations of inequality, The Myth of Bureaucratic Neutrality is required reading for public administration scholars, practitioners, and students.

Shannon K. Portillo is associate dean for academic affairs for the KU Edwards Campus and School of Professional Studies and a professor in the School of Public Affairs and Administration at the University of Kansas. Her work explores how formal policies and informal social norms shape the work of public organizations. She is specifically interested in how racism and sexism impact organizations and workers’ experiences both historically and currently. Community service is a core value. Dr. Portillo served as Co-Chair of Governor Laura Kelly’s Commission on Racial Equity and Justice and Chair of the Douglas County Board of County Commissioners.

Nicole M. Humphrey is an assistant professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Miami. Her work utilizes organizational behavior concepts grounded in public management scholarship to gain insight into diversity and equity in public sector organizations.

Domonic A. Bearfield is an associate professor in the School of Public Affairs and Administration at Rutgers University-Newark. His work examines ideas related to race, gender, and public sector personnel. He also has a keen interest in issues that impact local governments, as well as the history of American public administration.

More from this author