Neonationalist Mythology in Postwar Japan

Regular price €62.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Nariaki Nakazato
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
Author_Nariaki Nakazato
automatic-update
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=HBJF
Category=HBW
Category=JPFN
Category=JWXK
Category=NHF
Category=NHW
COP=United States
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
eq_bestseller
eq_history
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Historical revisionism
India
International criminal justice
Japan
Language_English
Neonationalism
PA=Available
Price_€50 to €100
PS=Active
softlaunch
Tokyo war crimes
World War II

Product details

  • ISBN 9781498528375
  • Weight: 408g
  • Dimensions: 149 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 12 Sep 2017
  • Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Paperback
  • Language: English
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns
Radhabinod Pal was an Indian jurist who achieved international fame as the judge representing India at the Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal and dissented from the majority opinion, holding that all Japanese “Class A” war criminals were not guilty of any of the charges brought against them. In postwar Japanese politics, right-wing polemicists have repeatedly utilized his dissenting judgment in their political propaganda aimed at refuting the Tokyo trial’s majority judgment and justifying Japan’s aggression, gradually elevating this controversial lawyer from India to a national symbol of historical revisionism. Many questions have been raised about how to appropriately assess Pal’s dissenting judgment and Pal himself. Were the arguments in Pal’s judgment sound? Why did he submit such a bold dissenting opinion? What was the political context? More fundamentally, why and how did the Allies ever nominate such a lawyer as a judge for a tribunal of such great political importance? How should his dissent be situated within the context of modern Asian history and the development of international criminal justice? What social and political circumstances in Japan thrust him into such a prominent position? Many of these questions remain unanswered, while some have been misinterpreted. This book proposes answers to many of them and presents a critique of the persistent revisionist denial of war responsibility in the Japanese postwar right-wing movement.
Nariaki Nakazato is professor emeritus at the University of Tokyo.

More from this author