A01=Brian G. Slocum
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
american context
Author_Brian G. Slocum
automatic-update
cases
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=LA
communication
comprehension
conceptualization
construction
COP=United States
criminal
criminality
defendant
defense
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
development
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
identification
interpretation
judge
Language_English
laws
lawyer
legal studies
legality
lexical semantics
meaning
PA=Available
Price_€50 to €100
prosecution
PS=Active
questions
softlaunch
standard
supreme court
terminology
theoretical
theory
traditional doctrine
understanding
united states
usa
words
Product details
- ISBN 9780226304854
- Weight: 652g
- Dimensions: 16 x 24mm
- Publication Date: 22 Dec 2015
- Publisher: The University of Chicago Press
- Publication City/Country: US
- Product Form: Hardback
- Language: English
Secure
checkout
Fast Shipping
Easy returns
Consider this court case: a defendant has traded a gun for drugs, and there is a criminal sentencing provision that stipulates an enhanced punishment if the defendant "uses" a firearm "during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime." Buying the drugs was obviously a crime - but can it be said that the defendant actually "used" the gun? This is the sort of question at the heart of legal interpretation. The field is built around one key question: by what standard should legal texts be interpreted? The traditional doctrine is that words should be given their "ordinary meaning": words in legal texts should be interpreted in light of accepted standards of communication. Yet often, courts fail to properly consider context, refer to unsuitable dictionary definitions, or otherwise misconceive how the ordinary meaning of words should be determined. In this book, Brian Slocum builds his argument for a new method of interpretation by asking glaring, yet largely ignored, questions. What makes one particular meaning the "ordinary" one, and how exactly do courts conceptualize the elements of ordinary meaning?
Ordinary Meaning provides a much-needed, revised framework, boldly instructing those involved with the law in how the components of ordinary meaning should properly be identified and developed in our modern legal system.
Brian G. Slocum is a professor of law at the University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law in Sacramento, California.
