Organizational Sociology

Regular price €458.80
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
american
American Journal
approach
asset
Asset Specificity
Category=JHM
Category=KJU
contingency approach
cost
ecology
Efficient Boundaries
eq_bestseller
eq_business-finance-law
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
External Transactions
Founding Rate
Graeme Salaman
ILM Arrangement
integrating organisational theories research
Interlock Ties
journal
Multidivisional Firm
neo-marxist perspective
organisational theory
Organization Environment Relations
Political Conflict Systems
population
population ecology
Profit Center
Profit Center Manager
Recent Foundings
resource dependence
Sic Industry
specificity
Strategic Choice
Strategic Contingencies Theory
Technological Discontinuities
transaction
Transaction Cost
transaction cost analysis
Transaction Cost Approach
Transfer Pricing Policy
ULS Estimate
Vice Versa
wh1
Wh1 Ch

Product details

  • ISBN 9781855214064
  • Weight: 660g
  • Dimensions: 169 x 244mm
  • Publication Date: 26 May 1994
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns
The readings collected in Organizational Sociology are organized so as to direct attention to the six major theoretical traditions which have emerged since the 1960s to guide research and interpretation of organizational structure and performance. The traditions reviewed are: Contingency theory, Resource dependence. Population and Community ecology, Transactions costs economics, Neo-Marxist theory and Institutional Theory. Major statements of each theory are presented together with examples of related empirical research. A concluding section provides examples of recent attempts to combine and integrate two or more of these theories, as analysts attempt to account for some aspects of organization. Rather than pitting one perspective against another, contemporary analysts are more likely to selectively combine elements from several theories in order to better understand the phenomenon of interest.
W. Richard Scott