Origins of Mathematical Knowledge in Childhood

Regular price €192.20
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
A01=Catherine Sophian
additive and multiplicative thinking
Alternative Solution Methods
Approximate Number Representations
Author_Catherine Sophian
Category=JMR
Category=JNC
Category=PB
Children's Mathematical Thinking
childrens
Children’s Mathematical Thinking
cognitive psychology
conceptual understanding of fractions
continuous
contour
Contour Length
developmental mathematics
early math education
Early Numerical Abilities
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Error Detection Task
Fraction Learning
Fraction Magnitudes
Higher Order Units
Information Processing Demands
Knowledge Acquisition
length
Mathematical Knowledge
multiplicative
Multiplicative Commutativity
Multiplicative Comparison
Multiplicative Reasoning
Multiplicative Situations
Number Word Meanings
numerical
Numerical Comparison Task
Numerical Knowledge
numerosities
Object File Theory
quantitative reasoning
quantities
relation
Relative Numerosity
small
Small Numerosities
Stable Order Principle
unit concept learning
Verbal Counting
Vice Versa

Product details

  • ISBN 9780805857580
  • Weight: 550g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 21 Jun 2007
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Inc
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

This book examines the origins and development of children's mathematical knowledge. It contrasts the widely held view that counting is the starting point for mathematical development with an alternative comparison-of-quantities position. According to the comparison-of-quantities position, the concept of number builds upon more basic concepts of equality, inequality, and less-than and greater-than relations, which derive from comparisons between unenumerated quantities such as lengths. The concept of number combines these basic comparative concepts with the concept of a unit of measure, which allows one quantity to be described as a multiple of another.

Sophian examines these alternative accounts of children's developing mathematical knowledge in the light of research:

  • on children's counting;
  • on their reasoning about continuous quantities such as length and area;
  • on the development of the concept of unit;
  • on additive and multiplicative reasoning; and
  • on knowledge about fractions.

In the closing chapters, Sophian draws out the developmental and the educational implications of the research and theory presented. Developmentally, the comparison-of-quantities position undermines the idea that numerical knowledge develops through domain-specific learning mechanisms in that it links numerical development both to physical knowledge about objects, which is the starting point for the concept of unit, and to the acquisition of linguistic number terms. Instructionally, the comparison-of-quantities perspective diverges from the counting-first perspective in that it underscores the continuity between whole-number arithmetic and fraction learning that stems from the importance of the concept of unit for both. Building on this idea, Sophian advances three instructional recommendations: First, instruction about numbers should always be grounded in thinking about quantities and how numbers represent the relations between them; second, instruction in the early years should always be guided by a long-term perspective in which current objectives are shaped by an understanding of their role in the overall course of mathematics learning; and third, instruction should be directly toward promoting the acquisition of the most general mathematical knowledge possible.

The Origins of Mathematical Knowledge in Childhood is intended for researchers, professionals, and graduate students in developmental psychology, educational psychology, and mathematics education, and as a supplementary text for advanced undergraduate courses in cognitive development, educational psychology, and mathematics education.

More from this author