Appalachian Ohio
associational
Associational Sector
based
Business Sector
Case Study
Category=GTU
Category=JPHV
Central Government
Civil Society
civil society participation
collaborative governance
conflict resolution methods
Contemporary Society
contracting
deliberative democracy
Developmental Local Government
EC Program
empowerment
Empowerment Zone
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Faith Based
Local Development
local government innovation
multi-sector policy decision making
Participatory Governance
performance
Procedural Planning Theory
public
Public Administration
Public Examination Process
Public Health Advocates
Responsive Polity
RSF
rural
Rural Action
Rural EZ
sector
stakeholder engagement
State Rural Development Councils
Tobacco Communities
USDA Rural Development
World Vision Staff
zone
zones
Product details
- ISBN 9781138250499
- Weight: 530g
- Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
- Publication Date: 30 Nov 2016
- Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
- Publication City/Country: GB
- Product Form: Paperback
Secure
checkout
Fast Shipping
Easy returns
In recent years a new participatory governance dynamic has been redefining relationships and responsibilities in the planning and implementation of policies and programs. Participatory governance not only crosses public, private and associational sectors, but is also intra-organizational. It allows for individual and collective participation, and challenges longstanding norms of institutional behavior. This book examines fresh evidence relating to planning, conflict mediation and public decision-making processes in civil society by bringing together a multi-disciplinary team of practitioners and scholars from North America, Europe, Africa and Australia. In an analysis which spans institutional perspectives and operational concerns, the contributors explore the dynamics of stakeholder involvement as deliberative processes constructed around the core idea of shared responsibility. The book draws out important principles as to how this diversity of engagement can translate itself into more effective public decision-making.
W. Robert Lovan, Michael Murray, Ron Shaffer
