Pattern and Meaning in History (RLE Social Theory)

Regular price €86.99
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
Category=JHBA
Category=QDTS
Circuitous
cultural sciences
Destiny
Dichtung Und Wahrheit
Dilthey's philosophy of history
Dilthey's Theory
Dilthey's Thought
Dilthey's work
Dilthey’s Theory
Dilthey’s Thought
Dogmatic Narrowness
epistemology of history
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Face To Face
Follow
Geistige Welt
hermeneutics
Historical Events Periods
Historical Imagination
Historical Scepticism
Holds
Human Studies
intellectual historiography
interpretive social sciences
Life Formed
Mankind
Mental Content
Mere Sum
natural science
Objective Mind
Outer Manifestations
positivism
Relation Ship
Robinson Crusoes
Rous Seau
Social Historical World
social theory methodology
Timeless

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138786233
  • Weight: 385g
  • Dimensions: 156 x 234mm
  • Publication Date: 08 Aug 2014
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

'One may state Dilthey's significance in most general fashion by characterizing his work as the first thorough-going and sophisticated confrontation of history with positivism and natural science. Dilthey's sweep was universal: he strove to reduce to order the multifarious realms of knowledge, the conflicting traditions of cultural study, that he had embraced. Thus Dilthey laid out a program that no mortal – and certainly no one whose mind had been formed in the third quarter of the nineteenth century – could hope to bring to completion. Yet despite its inconclusiveness, Dilthey's work exerted enormous influence. The distinction he had drawn between natural and cultural science became standard for historians and, to a lesser extent, for social scientists also. After Dilthey historians no longer needed to apologize for the "unscientific" character of their discipline: they understood why its methods could never be quite the same as those of natural science. And the contemporary tradition of intellectual history grew naturally out of Dilthey's teaching.' – H. Stuart Hughes