Philosophical Logic

Regular price €192.20
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
A01=John MacFarlane
advanced logic course
alternatives to classical logic
Analytic philosophy
Author_John MacFarlane
Binary Quantifiers
Category=QDTJ
Category=QDTL
Classical Logic
Definite Descriptions
Disjunctive Normal Form
Disjunctive Syllogism
DNE
Elimination Rules
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
Existential quantifiers
Falso Quodlibet
formal reasoning
Indicative Conditional
Introduction Rule
Intuitionistic Logic
Logical Consequence
logical inference
Material Conditionals
Modal logic
Modal Predicate Logic
Modus Ponens
Nonlogical Expressions
Philosophical issues
Philosophical logic
predicate calculus
proof theory
Propositional Constant
Propositional Modal Logic
Relevance Logic
Representational Semantics
semantic paradoxes
Sorites Paradox
Substitutional Quantification
Truth Preservation
Truth Table
Vice Versa

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138737648
  • Weight: 453g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 30 Nov 2020
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Introductory logic is generally taught as a straightforward technical discipline. In this book, John MacFarlane helps the reader think about the limitations of, presuppositions of, and alternatives to classical first-order predicate logic, making this an ideal introduction to philosophical logic for any student who already has completed an introductory logic course.

The book explores the following questions. Are there quantificational idioms that cannot be expressed with the familiar universal and existential quantifiers? How can logic be extended to capture modal notions like necessity and obligation? Does the material conditional adequately capture the meaning of 'if'—and if not, what are the alternatives? Should logical consequence be understood in terms of models or in terms of proofs? Can one intelligibly question the validity of basic logical principles like Modus Ponens or Double Negation Elimination? Is the fact that classical logic validates the inference from a contradiction to anything a flaw, and if so, how can logic be modified to repair it? How, exactly, is logic related to reasoning? Must classical logic be revised in order to be applied to vague language, and if so how? Each chapter is organized around suggested readings and includes exercises designed to deepen the reader's understanding.

Key Features:

  • An integrated treatment of the technical and philosophical issues comprising philosophical logic
  • Designed to serve students taking only one course in logic beyond the introductory level
  • Provides tools and concepts necessary to understand work in many areas of analytic philosophy
  • Includes exercises, suggested readings, and suggestions for further exploration in each chapter

John MacFarlane is Professor of Philosophy and a member of the Group in Logic and the Methodology of Science at the University of California, Berkeley. He is the author of Assessment Sensitivity: Relative Truth and Its Applications (2014).

More from this author