Philosophy, Expertise, and the Myth of Neutrality

Regular price €179.80
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
Andrea Lavazza
authority
automatic-update
B01=Andrea Lavazza
B01=Mirko Farina
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=HPK
Category=HPS
Category=QDTK
Category=QDTS
cognitive psychology of expertise
communitarianism
COP=United Kingdom
Delivery_Pre-order
denialism
epistemic authority
epistemic justice in expert advice
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
ethical decision making
expertise
hypocrisy
intellectual virtues
knowledge claims
Language_English
Mirko Farina
naturalistic decision making
neutrality
objectivity
PA=Not yet available
pandemic
Price_€100 and above
PS=Forthcoming
public policy
public policy analysis
science communication strategies
softlaunch
testimony
trustworthiness
value free theory
values in science

Product details

  • ISBN 9781032449159
  • Weight: 576g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 29 Mar 2024
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
  • Language: English
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

This volume offers a new framework for understanding expertise. It proposes a reconceptualization of the traditional notion of expertise and calls for the development of a new contextual and action-oriented notion of expertise, which is attentive to axiological values, intellectual virtues, and moral qualities.

Experts are usually called upon, especially during times of emergency, either as decision-makers or as advisors in formulating policies that often have a significant impact on society. And yet, for certain types of choices, there is a growing tension between experts’ recommendations and alternative views. The chapters in this volume critically assess the idea of whether possessing epistemic authority can automatically make someone’s assertions necessarily more grounded than others. They not only evaluate the epistemological implications of this idea but also reflect on its ethical, socio-cultural, and political consequences. The interdisciplinary framework advanced across the chapters seeks to overcome certain limitations that underlie current models of expertise by adopting more inclusive and representative decisions that can improve the perceived neutrality of experts’ decisions. Increasing neutrality means reducing cases in which an unidentified bias – be it a scientific one or not – puts any of the individuals involved in a specific public choice at a systematic disadvantage.

Philosophy, Expertise, and the Myth of Neutrality will appeal to scholars and advanced students working in epistemology, philosophy of science, philosophy of the social sciences, public policy, and sociology.

Mirko Farina is Professor and Head of the Human Machine Interaction Lab (HMI Lab) in the Institute for Digital Economy and Artificial Systems (IDEAS), a joint collaboration between Xiamen University (XMU) and Lomonosov Moscow State University (MSU). Prior to that he was Associate Professor of Philosophy at Innopolis University.

Andrea Lavazza is a moral philosopher and a neuroethicist. He is Senior Research Fellow at the Centro Universitario Internazionale, Arezzo, Italy, and Adjunct Professor in Neuroethics at the University of Milan and at the University of Pavia, Italy. His main interests are at the intersection of ethics, epistemology, and cognitive science.