Plato's Hippias Minor

Regular price €92.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Zenon Culverhouse
action
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
agent
ambiguity
Ancient Greek philosophy
Ancient Literary Criticism
ancient philosophy
Author_Zenon Culverhouse
automatic-update
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=DSBB
Category=DSG
classical studies
Classics
COP=United States
deception
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
eq_bestseller
eq_biography-true-stories
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
Hippias Minor
history of philosophy
Homer
honesty
Language_English
lying
PA=Available
Plato
Price_€50 to €100
PS=Active
Socrates
softlaunch
truth
virtue
voluntary action

Product details

  • ISBN 9781793611215
  • Weight: 395g
  • Dimensions: 162 x 231mm
  • Publication Date: 29 Jul 2021
  • Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Hardback
  • Language: English
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns
Philosophers accuse Socrates of advancing unfair, if not fallacious, arguments in Plato’s Hippias Minor more than in most other dialogues. In Hippias Minor, Socrates appears to defend the trickster Odysseus, and in the course of doing so he argues for outrageous claims: the honest person and the liar are no different, and the good person is one who does wrong voluntarily. In Plato’s Hippias Minor: The Play of Ambiguity, Zenon Culverhouse argues that Socrates’ questionable behavior is no coincidence in a dialogue about deception and that Socrates is examining what counts as deception and how it reflects one’s excellence. More broadly, the dialogue is about the relationship between the speaker and what is said, between agent and action. Thus, the dialogue marks an important contribution not only to Socrates’ thinking about virtue and voluntary action but also to Plato’s portrait of Socrates. For the latter, Culverhouse argues that the dialogue further defines the sometimes thin line between Socrates and his contemporaries, the sophists. Rather than exploiting ambiguity in key terms of the argument to trip up his opponent, Socrates playfully explores these ambiguities to illuminate Hippias’—and perhaps our own—serious commitments about human excellence.
Zenon Culverhouse is associate professor of philosophy at the University of the Incarnate Word in San Antonio.

More from this author