Polarisation, Arrogance, and Dogmatism

Regular price €142.99
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
Abortion Debate
argumentative bias
Argumentative Practices
Black Lives Matter Activists
Category=JHBA
Category=JPA
Category=QDTK
Category=QDTQ
Category=QDTS
Cognitive Biases
Conferred
deep disagreement in philosophy
Dense
dogmatism
Epistemic Egocentrism
Epistemic Principle
Epistemic Rights
epistemic trust
Epistemic Virtue
Epistemically Irresponsible
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Face To Face
Follow
Good Arguer
IH
Intellectual Arrogance
intellectual humility
Intellectual Vices
Intellectually Virtuous
intransigence
Martial Metaphor
MMR Vaccine
moral disagreement
polarisation
science denialism
Science Denialists
Science Deniers
social epistemology
VH
Vice Versa
Violated

Product details

  • ISBN 9780367260859
  • Weight: 650g
  • Dimensions: 156 x 234mm
  • Publication Date: 20 Jul 2020
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Polarisation, intransigence and dogmatism in political and moral debate have in recent years threatened to overwhelm many Western-style democracies, where for centuries reasoned argument has been a hallmark feature of tackling disagreement. For many people, this marks a worrying deterioration in the moral and political climate, threatening to create a divisive environment of "us" versus "them".

In this superb collection a team of international contributors examine these pressing issues from a philosophical perspective. Topics explored include: the problem of "deep disagreements"; martial conceptions of argumentation and the motivation to argue to win; epistemic egocentrism; intellectual trust; bullshit and dogmatism; intellectual humility and the internet; epistemic and "tribal" arrogance and authoritarianism; empathy and polarisation; and epistemic rights violations.

Polarisation, Arrogance, and Dogmatism: Philosophical Perspectives will be of great interest to researchers in political philosophy, applied and social epistemology, ethics and feminist philosophy, as well as those working in politics and sociology.

Alessandra Tanesini is Professor of Philosophy at Cardiff University, UK.

Michael P. Lynch is Board of Trustees Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at the University of Connecticut, USA.