Political Philosophy

Regular price €31.99
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
A01=Jonathan Quong
Albert
Argument
Author_Jonathan Quong
Burdens
Bystanders
Category=JPA
Category=QDTS
Citizens
Clara
Community
Comply
Consistent
Defensive harm
Democracy
Democratic
Democratic decisions
Democratic egalitarians
Democratic institutions
Democratically
Determinate
Directives
Doctor
Duty
Egalitarian
Enforce
Enforce unjust
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_new_release
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Equality
Force
Freedom
Government
Government officials
Harmful interference
Independence
Indeterminacy
Injustice
Institutions
Instrumental
Instrumental argument
Interference
Justice
Justification
Justification thesis
Kantian
Legal
Legislation
Legitimacy
Legitimate
Legitimate authority
Liability
Liable
Moral
Moral rights
Morality
Officials liable
Officials permissibly
Plausible
Policies
Policy
Priority
Proposal
Puzzle
Relations
Relationship
Rightful
Scope
Substantive
Substantively unjust
Theories
Thesis
Unilateral
Unjust laws
Viehoff
Virtue

Product details

  • ISBN 9780691215648
  • Dimensions: 140 x 216mm
  • Publication Date: 03 Mar 2026
  • Publisher: Princeton University Press
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

How to understand a long-standing puzzle in political philosophy: the relationship between justice and legitimacy

Can laws be unjust and yet remain, in some sense, morally legitimate? In this book, Jonathan Quong considers central issues in political philosophy through the lens of this single question. He explores and evaluates recent influential work on this topic and then proposes a novel approach of his own. The puzzle at the heart of his account is the phenomenon of legitimate injustice—laws and policies that are substantively unjust yet may be legitimately imposed by government officials. How can such laws be legitimate if, as some have argued, justice is the first virtue of social institutions?

Quong analyzes the work of those who deny that injustice committed by states can be legitimate simply by virtue of its democratic or procedural pedigree; the Kantian account of legitimate institutions and justice; instrumental approaches to political legitimacy; and the recent wave of work in democratic theory focused on its egalitarian character. Arguing that these analyses do not offer an adequate solution to the puzzle and that there are compelling reasons to revise or reject them, Quong lays out his view and explains the implications for more general theories of political morality. He argues that we can explain legitimate injustice by appeal to distributive justice. If political disagreement is inevitable, then unjust legislation is largely unavoidable; it constitutes a burden that must be distributed according to just principles. Quong’s novel and illuminating framework offers a unique introduction to crucial questions in political philosophy.

Jonathan Quong is professor of philosophy and law at the University of Southern California. He is the author of Liberalism without Perfection and The Morality of Defensive Force.

More from this author