Politics of Public Broadcasting in Britain and Japan

Regular price €192.20
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
A01=Henry Laurence
Asian Women's Fund
Asian Women’s Fund
Author_Henry Laurence
BBC Content
BBC Monopoly
BBC Trust
BBC's Reputation
BBC’s Reputation
Category=ATF
Category=ATJ
Category=ATL
Category=GTM
Category=JBCT
Category=JPWC
Category=NH
Comfort Women
Commercial Broadcasters
comparative analysis of BBC and NHK
comparative media systems
democratic communication studies
editorial independence
eq_art-fashion-photography
eq_bestseller
eq_history
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
FMT
ITV
LDP
LDP Politician
media policy analysis
MITI
MPT
NTT
Online Expansion
Public Broadcasting
Public Service Broadcasting
public service broadcasting research
Public Service Media
Reuters Institute Digital News Report
SCAP
Secretary Of State
state media relations
Trusted News Source
Tsukuru Kai
Violated

Product details

  • ISBN 9781032310381
  • Weight: 494g
  • Dimensions: 156 x 234mm
  • Publication Date: 29 Jul 2022
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

The BBC and NHK have dominated their national media systems since the 1920s and still play a central role in shaping political, social and cultural life. Both are highly trusted news organizations, and vitally influence national identity. Yet despite remarkably similar organizational and funding structures, they differ in their editorial autonomy, relationship to the state, and in the social and cultural roles they play. While the BBC, proud of its independence, acts as a watchdog on the powerful, NHK prefers a guide dog role cooperating with rather than confronting political elites. The BBC is also more willing to challenge prevailing social norms, often serving as an agent of social change. NHK prefers to avoid controversy, serving as an agent of social stability.

The book argues that these differences were shaped by decades of conflict and cooperation between broadcasters, governments, commercial media, interest groups and audiences. The broadcasters adopted distinctive editorial strategies to retain public support and elite approval in the face of technological upheaval, hostility from commercial rivals, and continuous political interference. Both, however, continue to uphold the belief that democratic and social goals are better served by public rather than commercial media.

Henry Laurence is Associate Professor at Bowdoin College, Maine, USA.

More from this author