Pragmatism

Regular price €62.99
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
Animal Kingdom
Applicative Efficacy
Ars Gratia Artis
Category=QD
Category=QDHR
Cognitive Evolution
Effective Praxis
efficacy
Epistemic Pragmatists
epistemology
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
Equilateral Hyperbola
Functional Efficacy
Functionalistic Pragmatism
induction justification
Inductive Practices
logic and cognition
Methodological Pragmatism
Mind Independent Reality
Nicholas Rescher
Ontological Obligation
philosophy of science
Pierre Duhem
pragmatic
Pragmatic Efficacy
Pragmatic Success
pragmatic theory of knowledge
Pragmatic Validation
Purposive Efficacy
Purposive Enterprise
Quality Control Monitor
Rational Cogency
Rational Inquirers
rational inquiry
scientific methodology
Thirteen Pragmatisms
Warranted Assertability
World's Scheme
World’s Scheme

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138513495
  • Weight: 453g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 28 Sep 2017
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Pragmatism is rooted in the linking of practice and theory. It describes a process where theory is extracted from practice, and applied back to practice to form what is called intelligent practice. Pragmatism was intended, by Charles S. Peirce, its founder, as a doctrine for the rational substantiation of knowledge claims. For Peirce, what mattered was successful prediction and control. Practice was to serve as the arbiter of theory. Objective efficacy, not personal satisfaction, is what matters for fixing opinion in a community of rational inquirers.

According to Nicholas Rescher, later pragmatists saw the matter differently. They envisioned subjective satisfactions, rather than objectively determinable functional effectiveness, as being the aim of the enterprise. Rescher notes that William James, in particular, had an agenda different from that of Peirce.

The two pragmatisms are complete opposites, Rescher argues, in terms of claims and intentions. James's soft pragmatism abandons the classical idea of inquiry as the paramount of truth; it believes that truth is an illusion, an unrealizable figment of the imagination. By contrast, Peirce's hard pragmatism believes that the classic idea of truth remains valid. Rescher seeks to examine and explore pragmatism dialectically, with a conviction that brings pragmatism to life for specialist and generalist alike.