Precedents, Statutes, and Analysis of Legal Concepts
Regular price
€210.80
14 days return policy
Shipping & Delivery
appellate decision making
case
Case Western Reserve Law Review
Category=A
chicago
Chicago Law
Chicago Law Review
Chicago Law School
Columbia Law Review47
decisis
eq_art-fashion-photography
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
Harvard Law Review Association
judicial power legitimacy analysis
judicial reasoning
law
Law Review
legal formalism realism
legal interpretation theory
philosophical jurisprudence
Ratio Decidendi
reserve
review
Roscoe Pound
stare
Stare Decisis
statutory construction methods
Tu Tu
University Of Wisconsin
vanderbilt
western
wisconsin
Product details
- ISBN 9780815326564
- Weight: 900g
- Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
- Publication Date: 01 Mar 1998
- Publisher: Taylor & Francis Inc
- Publication City/Country: US
- Product Form: Hardback
Secure
checkout
Fast Shipping
Easy returns
At least since plato and Aristotle, thinkers have pondered the relationship between philosophical arguments and the "sophistical" arguments offered by the Sophists -- who were the first professional lawyers. Judges wield substantial political power, and the justifications they offer for their decisions are a vital means by which citizens can assess the legitimacy of how that power is exercised. However, to evaluate judicial justifications requires close attention to the method of reasoning behind decisions. This new collection illuminates and explains the political and moral importance in justifying the exercise of judicial power.
