Presidential Power, Rhetoric, and the Terror Wars

Regular price €102.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Alexander Hiland
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
American government
American presidency
Author_Alexander Hiland
automatic-update
Barack Obama
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=CFG
Category=GTC
Category=JPQ
Category=JPS
COP=United States
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
eq_bestseller
eq_dictionaries-language-reference
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
executive orders
George W. Bush
imperial presidency
Language_English
PA=Available
Political Science
presidential policy directives
Presidential power
presidential rhetoric
Price_€50 to €100
PS=Active
rhetoric
rhetorical criticism
Security Studies
signing statements
softlaunch
terror wars
war on terror

Product details

  • ISBN 9781498598255
  • Weight: 576g
  • Dimensions: 161 x 230mm
  • Publication Date: 21 Oct 2019
  • Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Hardback
  • Language: English
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns
Presidential Power, Rhetoric, and the Terror Wars: The Sovereign Presidency argues that the War on Terror provided an opportunity to fundamentally change the presidency. Alexander Hiland analyzes the documents used to exercise presidential powers, including executive orders, signing statements, and presidential policy directives. Treating these documents as genres of speech-act that are ideologically motivated, Hiland provides a rhetorical criticism that illuminates the values and political convictions at play in these documents. This book reveals how both President George W. Bush and President Barack Obama wielded the personal power of the office to dramatically expand the power of the executive branch. During the War on Terror, the presidency shifted from an imperial form that avoided checks and balances, to a sovereign presidency where the executive branch had the ability to decide whether those checks and balances existed. As a result, Hiland argues that this shift to the sovereign presidency enabled the violation of human rights, myriad policy mistakes, and the degradation of democracy within the United States.
Alexander Hiland is lecturer in communication studies and assistant director of debate at James Madison University.

More from this author