Print, Visuality, and Gender in Eighteenth-Century Satire

Regular price €56.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Katherine Mannheimer
advice
Animal Kingdom
augustan
Augustan literature
Augustan Satire
Augustan Satirists
Author_Katherine Mannheimer
Beinecke Rare Book
Bird's Eye
Bird’s Eye
Book III
Category=DSB
dressing
Eighteenth Century Aesthetic Discourse
Eighteenth Century Satire
eighteenth-century satire studies
empirical gaze ethics
Enlightenment epistemology
eq_bestseller
eq_biography-true-stories
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
Free Indirect Discourse
gender politics literature
Horatian Imitations
Janine Barchas
lady
Lady's Dressing Room
ladys
Lady’s Dressing Room
Literary Confusion
mary
montagu
ocularcentrism critique
Pope's Poem
Pope's Satire
Pope's Text
Pope’s Poem
Pope’s Satire
Pope’s Text
Rochester Libraries
Rochester's Satires
Rochester’s Satires
room
sober
Sober Advice
Swift's Battle
Swift's Poem
Swift’s Battle
Swift’s Poem
Transportative Sweep
TRISTRAM SHANDY
Typographic Strategies
typographical analysis
William King
wortley

Product details

  • ISBN 9780367866181
  • Weight: 453g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 10 Dec 2019
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

This study interprets eighteenth-century satire’s famous typographical obsession as a fraught response to the Enlightenment’s "ocularcentric" epistemological paradigms, as well as to a print-cultural moment identified by book-historians as increasingly "visual" — a moment at which widespread attention was being paid, for the first time, to format, layout, and eye-catching advertising strategies. On the one hand, the Augustans were convinced of the ability of their elaborately printed texts to function as a kind of optical machinery rivaling that of the New Science, enhancing readers’ physical but also moral vision. On the other hand, they feared that an overly scrutinizing gaze might undermine the viewer’s natural faculty for candor and sympathy, delight and desire. In readings of Pope, Swift, and Montagu, Mannheimer shows how this distrust of the empirical gaze led to a reconsideration of the ethics, and most specifically the gender politics, of ocularcentrism. Whereas Montagu effected this reconsideration by directly satirizing both the era’s faith in the visual and its attendant publishing strategies, Pope and Swift pursued their critique via print itself: thus whether via facing-page translations, fictional editors, or disingenuous footnotes, these writers sought to ensure that typography never became either a mere tool of (or target for) the objectifying gaze, but rather that it remained a dynamic and interactive medium by which readers could learn both to see and to see themselves seeing.

Katherine Mannheimer is an assistant Professor of English at the University of Rochester, USA.

More from this author