Public Policy Evaluation

Regular price €173.60
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Stuart S. Nagel
Alan Stone
Alternative Public Policies
Author_Stuart S. Nagel
Category=JBF
Category=JPA
Category=JPH
Category=JPQB
Category=KJM
Category=KNV
decision-making frameworks
Energy Policy
eq_bestseller
eq_business-finance-law
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Government Structures
Greenwood Press
JAI Press
Lexington Books
multi-criteria decision analysis
Negative Income Tax Experiments
policy analysis methods
policy process evaluation
Policy Studies
Policy Studies Field
Policy Studies Journal
Policy Studies Review
Public Administration
public administration theory
Public Policy Evaluation
Public Policy Problems
Public Policy Studies
Quorum Books
Sc Ien Ce
Social Science Generalizations
Societal Productivity
SOS
Specific Policy Problems
St Martin's Press
St Martin’s Press
stakeholder consensus
Vice Versa
West Germany
win-win solutions

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138326910
  • Weight: 880g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 219mm
  • Publication Date: 30 Jul 2018
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

First published in 1998, this volume examines how super-optimum decisions involve finding alternatives to controversies whereby Conservatives, Liberals, or other major groups can all come out ahead of their best initial expectations simultaneously. This book is organised in terms of concepts, methods, causes, process, substance, and the policy studies profession. Concepts clarify that policy evaluation traditionally involves: (1) Goals to be achieved; (2) Alternatives available for achieving them; (3) Relations between goals and alternatives; (4) Drawing a conclusion as to the best alternative in light of the goals, alternatives, and relations; and (5) Analysing how the conclusion would change if there were changes in the goals, alternatives, or relations. Super-optimizing also involves five related steps, but with the following improvements: (1) Goals are designed as conservative, liberal, or neutral; (2) Alternatives get the same designations; (3) Relations are simplified to indicate which alternatives are relatively high or low on each goal; (4) The conclusion involves arriving at an alternative that does better on Goal A than Alternative A, and simultaneously better on Goal B than Alternative B; and (5) The fifth step involves analysing the super-optimum or win-win alternative in terms of its feasibility as to the economic, technological, psychological, political, administrative, and legal matters.

More from this author