Race, Gender, and the History of Early Analytic Philosophy

Regular price €44.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A. N. Prior
A01=Matt LaVine
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
analytic feminism
Author_Matt LaVine
automatic-update
Bertrand Russell
Black Lives Matter
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=HBTB
Category=HPS
Category=JBSF
Category=JFSJ
Category=NHTB
Category=QDTS
Charles Mills
COP=United States
critical race theory
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
eq_bestseller
eq_history
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
G. E. M. Anscombe
G. E. Moore
Gottlob Frege
history of philosophy
history of philosophy of science
Language_English
Left Wing of the Vienna Circle
logic
logical empiricism
Ludwig Wittgenstein
Moorean common sense
PA=Available
philosophy of language
Price_€20 to €50
PS=Active
public philosophy
Rudolf Carnap
Ruth Barcan Marcus
Sally Haslanger
social justice
softlaunch
Susan Stebbing
W. V. O. Quine

Product details

  • ISBN 9781498595575
  • Weight: 372g
  • Dimensions: 154 x 221mm
  • Publication Date: 15 May 2022
  • Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Paperback
  • Language: English
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns
Although what we now call “analytic philosophy” has been around at least since the turn of the twentieth century, it wasn’t until the latter half of the twentieth century that it became the dominant mode of philosophizing in the Western world. In Race, Gender, and the History of Early Analytic Philosophy, Matt LaVine argues that the changes associated with this shift from early analytic philosophy, a revolutionary movement, to later analytic philosophy, the hegemon, have not been sufficiently recognized. While a significant portion of the analytic philosophy of the late 1900s was apolitical and conservative, LaVine argues that there is much to gain by thinking of early analytic philosophy in relation to liberatory and emancipatory political aims. In particular, there is great potential in bringing together inquiry into critical theories of race and gender with inquiry into analytic philosophy. LaVine supports this idea by discussing the philosophy of language and logic in relation to the Black Lives Matter movement, the objectification of women, and more. Furthermore, LaVine argues there is more precedent for this type of work in the history of early analytic philosophy—in particular, in the work of G.E. Moore, Susan Stebbing, Rudolf Carnap, and Ruth Barcan Marcus—than is traditionally recognized.
Matt LaVine is assistant professor of interdisciplinary studies, coordinator of the exploratory program, and program analyst in the division of diversity, equity, and inclusion at SUNY Potsdam.

More from this author