Rational and the Social

Regular price €63.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=James Robert Brown
arationality
Arationality Principle
Author_James Robert Brown
Bad Faeces
Category=JHBA
cognitive
Cognitive Sociology
comparative theory evaluation
epistemology of science
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Evidential Role
Feminist Empiricism
Gravity Waves
laboratory ethnography
larry
Larry Laudan
laudan
Methodological Research Programmes
Normative Methodology
Normative Philosophy
Normative Reconstructions
principle
programme
Rational Reconstructions
Research Programmes
RLE
science studies
scientific methodology
social influences on scientific practice
sociological
Sociological Turn
sociology
sociology of knowledge
Solar Neutrino Experiments
Spontaneous Generation Theory
strong
Strong Programme
Symmetry Principle
Theoretical Reconstruction
Theory T2
Trf
turn
Twin Earth
Underdetermination Argument
Violated

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138784109
  • Weight: 550g
  • Dimensions: 156 x 234mm
  • Publication Date: 08 Aug 2014
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

To paraphrase Marx, sociologists have only interpreted science; the point is to improve it. The Rational and the Social attempts both. It begins by sketching recent sociological approaches to science, notably the strong programme – Bloor’s ‘science of science’ and Barnes’s ‘finitism’ – and that of the ‘anthropologists in the lab’, Collins and Latour and Woolgar. The author argues that although sociological accounts are valuable in many respects, when morals are drawn about the structure and epistemology of science, they are badly flawed. In rejecting the sociological theory of science, it is not necessary to conclude that science develops without reference to the social. James Robert Brown argues for an alternative account. He proposes a novel way of viewing the history of science as a source of evidence for how to do good science and argues that the most important aspect of methodology is that it is comparative. Rival theories are evaluated by comparison and the contribution of the social to this process is inevitable and should be acknowledged. This is the challenge to science.

More from this author