Rationality and Relativism

Regular price €137.99
Quantity:
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
A01=I.C. Jarvie
Animal Kingdom
anthropology
anti-relativism debate
Author_I.C. Jarvie
big
Big Ditch
cargo
Cargo Cults
Category=JBCC
Category=JHBA
Category=JHMC
Category=NH
clauses
cognitive
cognitive anthropology
Cognitive Division
cultists
cultural diversity analysis
Dances
division
Draws Back
entrenched
Entrenched Clauses
eq_bestseller
eq_history
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Follow
history
Hold
Inclined
Live
Mankind
moral universalism
Mulattoes
Negative Commentators
philosophy of science
Port
Rational Belief
Rational Doctrine
Rational Essence
Rational Unity
rationality versus relativism in anthropology
reconstruction
scientific objectivity
Social System
Spiritsofthe Dead
Stronger
Traditional Social Forms
UN
Vice Versa

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138928343
  • Weight: 453g
  • Dimensions: 156 x 234mm
  • Publication Date: 21 Jul 2015
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Anthropology revolves round answers to problems about the nature, development and unity of mankind; problems that are both philosophical and scientific. In this book, first published in 1984, Professor Jarvie applies Popper’s philosophy of science to understanding the history and theory of anthropology. Jarvie describes how the ancient view that the aim of science and philosophy was to get at the truth is challenged in anthropology by the doctrine of cultural relativism; that is, that truth varies with the cultural framework. He shows how philosophers as various as Peter Winch, W.V.O. Quine, W.T. Jones, Nelson Goodman and Richard Rorty were influenced by this doctrine. Yet these philosophers also accept the value of rational argument. Jarvie believes that there is a contradiction between relativism and any notion of human rationality that centres around argument. Forced by the contradiction to choose between rationality and relativism, he argues strongly that logical, scientific and moral considerations favour rationality and urge repudiation of relativism. The central argument of the book is that relativism is intellectually disastrous and has fostered intellectual attitudes from which anthropology still suffers.

More from this author