Rationality, Relativism and Incommensurability

Regular price €132.99
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
A01=Howard Sankey
Author_Howard Sankey
Category=QD
Common Language
conceptual change
Epistemic Justification
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
Higher Order Algorithm
Higher Order Criteria
Incommensurability Thesis
Incommensurable Theories
Kuhn's Claim
Methodological Criteria
methodological pluralism
Methodological Rules
Methodological Standards
Natural Kind Terms
Natural Kinds
Operative Categorial Scheme
philosophy of science
Popper's Proposals
Sceptical Regress
Sceptical Relativism
Scheme Content Dualism
scientific methodology
scientific naturalism
semantic incommensurability debate
Single Scientific Method
Taxonomic Categories
Taxonomic Incommensurability
Taxonomic Structure
theory choice
Translation Failure
Truth Predicate
Untranslatable Language
Vice Versa

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138364141
  • Weight: 580g
  • Dimensions: 150 x 217mm
  • Publication Date: 05 Jun 2019
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

First published in 1997, this volume brings together a series of essays on the philosophy of science and responds to the "crisis of rationality" which evolved from the denial of both a stable methodology and a common language for science. Howard Sankey holds that important insights about scientific methodology and rationality may be gleaned from the historical approach, from which the existence of profound conceptual change in science, as well as the absence of a neutral observation language, are important findings. Half of Sankey’s essays concentrate specifically on the thesis that alternative scientific theories are incommensurable due to semantic differences between the vocabulary in which they are expressed. Several others seek to derive a new way of thinking about scientific rationality from the historical critique of the idea of a fixed scientific method. Still others demonstrate how some seemingly relativistic themes of the historical approach may be embraced in a non-relativistic manner within the context of a pluralistic and naturalistic theory of scientific methodology and rationality.

More from this author