Readercentric Writing for Digital Media

Regular price €117.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
50-100
A01=David Hailey
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
agile communication practices
Agile Programming
Alphanumeric Texts
Author_David Hailey
automatic-update
Bobby Flay
CANON PowerShot SX30
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=CBW
Category=CBWT
complicated
content strategy
COP=United States
Crackerjack Box
Darwin Information Typing Architecture
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
Dense
digital content assessment frameworks
digital rhetoric
disney
Disney Site
Displace Filter
Div
eq_bestseller
eq_dictionaries-language-reference
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
Format=BC
Format_Paperback
Hardboiled Detective
information
information systems writing
Language_English
LCD
Li Class
machine
Machine Readable Media
medium
Navigation Pages
online text analysis
PA=Available
Powell's Books
Powell’s Books
Price_€100 and above
professional
PS=Active
readable
Rhetorical Stance
ROI
salt
Salt Lick
Server Side Include
site
SN=Baywood's Technical Communications
softlaunch
systems
UCD
Usability Gurus
Usability Studies
user experience evaluation
User-Centric Sites
Young Men

Product details

  • ISBN 9780895038142
  • Format: Paperback
  • Weight: 408g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 28 Feb 2014
  • Publisher: Baywood Publishing Company Inc
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Paperback
  • Language: English
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

This book presents an altogether new approach to writing and evaluating writing in digital media. It suggests that usability theory provides few tools for evaluating content, because usability theory assumes only one kind of writing on the Internet. The author suggests three models: user-centric (usability model), persuasion-centric (encouraging the reader to linger and be persuaded--Canon camera ads), and quality-centric (encouraging the reader to linger and learn or be entertained because of the quality of the writing--NASA.gov and YouTube).

Designed for professional writers and writing students, this text provides a rubric for writing in digital media, but more importantly, it provides a rubric and vocabulary for identifying and explaining problems in copy that already exists. The Internet has become a pastiche of cut-and-paste content, often placed by non-writers to fill space for no particular reason or by computers with no oversight from humans (e.g., Amazon.com). Because these snippets are typically on topic (but often for the wrong purpose or audience), professional writers have difficulty identifying the problems and an even harder time explaining them. Finding an effective tool for identifying and explaining problems in digital content becomes a particularly important problem as writers increasingly struggle with growing complications in complex information systems (systems that create and manage their own content with little human intervention). Being able to look at a body of copy and immediately see that it is problematic is an important skill that is lacking in a surprising number of professional writers.

Dr. David Hailey has been researching and teaching professional and technical writing at Utah State University (USU), USA since 1994 and has been researching and developing digital media since 1991, working first with bulletin board and kiosk-based hypertexts and then with html-based hypermedia. He has produced more than a dozen book-length instructional projects for organisations, including the State of Utah, DOE, NSF, US West, EPA, NEH, Sandia National Laboratories, Hitachi, and Rio Tinto, as well as USU and the University of Texas at Tyle, USA. In his largest projects, Hailey was the principal architect for USU's online Master's degree. For the first six or so years of his time at USU, Hailey developed and tested instructional modules designed to permit independent learning among engineering students, working closely with the College of Engineering and a variety of national agencies. For the past ten years, Hailey has developed and tested methods for evaluating quality of content on the Internet, first studying the parameters of usability theory, then looking for more powerful alternatives. This book results from that research, presenting those more powerful alternatives. Currently, Hailey examines methods for applying these new rubrics to texts in complex information systems.

More from this author