Redefining Linguistics

Regular price €61.50
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
Academic Linguistics
Anaphoric Pronouns
Book III
Category=DS
code
Common Language
Double Conformity
eq_bestseller
eq_biography-true-stories
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eters
fixed
Fixed Code
fundam
furtherm
Generative Grammar
harris
Individual Language User
Intransitive Subject
Lexical Nouns
Linguistic Determinism
Linguistic Intersubjectivity
Linguistic Science
Locke's Scepticism
Locke’s Scepticism
Martian Investigation
Monologic Discourse
Nigel Love
ore
orthodox
Orthodox Linguistics
param
Paul Hopper
Permanent Entities
Referential Semantics
roy
Roy Harris
Semiotic Principle
Social Interactive Dimension
Speech Circuit
Synchronic Systems
Talbot J. Taylor
Telementational Model
Vice Versa

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138997127
  • Weight: 453g
  • Dimensions: 156 x 234mm
  • Publication Date: 26 Nov 2015
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

The academic discipline of linguistics is at a critical stage of development. Whatever consensus there may have been fifteen or even ten years ago is fast disappearing. A process of redefinition is underway, and it is the aim of this volume to contribute to that process, explain why a redefinition is needed, and how it should proceed. In the case of linguistics the subject is also the subject matter. Many linguists have ignored the problem of definition, simply regarding linguistics as the ‘science of language itself’. What, though, is ‘language itself’? Is it a language, ie English, Swahili? Or, language in a more general sense?

The primary goal of a redefinition of linguistics should be to demonstrate that language is not an objective matter. Linguistics is, and should be, the study of whatever is linguistically pertinent. A linguistics redefined would look at how we interpret and construct our day-to-day communication acts, what views of language are shared by and opposed by societies, and the source and roles that these views play in our living and learning experience. These papers argue the case for such a redefinition more explicitly than has ever been done before in modern linguistic theory. Such a redefined perspective, precisely because it is a perspective, subject to ‘outside’ influence, and in constant dialogue with the perspective of the other human sciences, must be endlessly redefined.

Hayley G. Davis, Talbot J. Taylor