Rendering School Resources More Effective
Regular price
€40.99
14 days return policy
Shipping & Delivery
Accountability Standards
Ar Ter
Avai Lab Le
Category=JN
class
Cost Function Analysis
Cost Function Coefficients
Cost Function Results
Cost Function Studies
credentials
cut
district
econometric education analysis
educational equity
emergency
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
equal access education reform
finance
Guaranteed Tax Base
instructional resource allocation
IR Study
licensing
Pay For Performance
Pe Rc
Per-pupil Spending
Professional Development
public school litigation
Reducing Teacher Attrition
Ro Om
school facility quality
School Finance System
scores
State's Accountability Standards
system
Ta Te
TAAS
TAAS Passing Rate
TAAS Score
TAKS Score
teacher
teacher workforce mobility
Texas Accountability System
tR Ac
Young Men
Product details
- ISBN 9780805894394
- Weight: 290g
- Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
- Publication Date: 02 Aug 2005
- Publisher: Taylor & Francis Inc
- Publication City/Country: US
- Product Form: Paperback
Secure
checkout
Fast Shipping
Easy returns
This is Volume 80, Issue 3 2005 of the Peabody Journal of Education and this special issue provides a collection of works on the topic of making school resources more effective in the U.S. The included articles look at educational finance, the Education Professions Act guidelines for more motivated teachers and leaders, licencing in public schools, a study on how teaching conditions impact teacher turnover in California, student achievement in relation to school facilities in Wyoming, and the value of econometric cost analysis in Texas. The final article includes the case of Williams vs the state of California, where in August 2000, the American Civil Liberties Union filed a class-action lawsuit on behalf of school children against the state of California. The suit, Williams v. State of California, alleged that the state failed to exercise its constitutional obligation to provide equal access to education for all students in the state by allowing deficient facilities, uncredentialed teachers, and inadequate or insufficient instructional materials.
James W. Guthrie, Matthew G. Springer
