Resurrection and Reception in Early Christianity

Regular price €65.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Richard C. Miller
Antoninus Liberalis
apotheosis
ascension
Author_Richard C. Miller
Bible
biblical
Category=DSBB
Category=NHC
Category=QRAX
Category=QRM
Category=QRMF13
Category=QRS
Category=QRVC
Category=QRVG
Christian
Christianity
Dennis MacDonald
Diodorus Siculus
Earliest Christian Movements
Early Christian
Early Christian Gospels
Early Christian Literature
Empty Tomb
eq_bestseller
eq_biography-true-stories
eq_history
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
Eschatological Resurrection
Gospel Narratives
Gospels
Greco-Roman
Hellenism
Hellenistic
Hellenistic Judaism
Hellenistic Levant
Hellenistic Roman World
Interpretatio Graeca
Jesus
Julius Proculus
Justin
Justin's Works
Justin’s Works
La Ressemblance
New Testament
Postmortem Accounts
Postmortem Appearance
resurrection
Resurrection Narratives
Roman
Roman Antiquity
Semitic
Tertullian's De Spectaculis
Tertullian’s De Spectaculis
Testament Gospels
Vice Versa
Young Man
Zeus's Thunderbolt
Zeus’s Thunderbolt

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138048270
  • Weight: 294g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 29 Mar 2017
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

This book offers an original interpretation of the origin and early reception of the most fundamental claim of Christianity: Jesus’ resurrection. Richard Miller contends that the earliest Christians would not have considered the New Testament accounts of Jesus’ resurrection to be literal or historical, but instead would have recognized this narrative as an instance of the trope of divine translation, common within the Hellenistic and Roman mythic traditions. Given this framework, Miller argues, early Christians would have understood the resurrection story as fictitious rather than historical in nature. By drawing connections between the Gospels and ancient Greek and Roman literature, Miller makes the case that the narratives of the resurrection and ascension of Christ applied extensive and unmistakable structural and symbolic language common to Mediterranean "translation fables," stock story patterns derived particularly from the archetypal myths of Heracles and Romulus. In the course of his argument, the author applies a critical lens to the referential and mimetic nature of the Gospel stories, and suggests that adapting the "translation fable" trope to accounts of Jesus’ resurrection functioned to exalt him to the level of the heroes, demigods, and emperors of the Hellenistic and Roman world. Miller’s contentions have significant implications for New Testament scholarship and will provoke discussion among scholars of early Christianity and Classical studies.

Richard C. Miller is an adjunct professor at Chapman University in the Department of Religious Studies.

More from this author