Revival: Legitimacy Deficit in Custom: Towards a Deconstructionist Theory (2001)

Regular price €173.60
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Ben Chiagra
Anglo Norwegian Fisheries Case
Author_Ben Chiagra
Ben Chigara
Category=JHB
CIL
Continental Shelf
Continental Shelf Area
Corfu Channel Case
customary international law
Elementary Considerations
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Equidistance Principle
Hierarchical Opposition
Historic Title
ICJ's Decision
ICJ's Determination
ICJ's View
ICJ’s Decision
ICJ’s Determination
ICJ’s View
ILA Committee
International
International Law
International Legal System
international tribunals
Law
legal theory
legitimacy of customary law processes
Nascent Norm
normative analysis
North Sea Continental Shelf Cases
Norway's Claim
Norway’s Claim
Opinio Juris
Persistent Objector
state practice objections
Straight Baselines
Subservience
transparency in lawmaking
Truman Proclamation
United Nations General Assembly Resolutions
Vice Versa

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138717459
  • Weight: 453g
  • Dimensions: 156 x 234mm
  • Publication Date: 28 Jun 2017
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

This title was first published in 2001. A discussion of customary international law (CIL). Throughout the study particular values are examined for their potential effect on the legitimacy of the process of custom. The writer argues that, in order to achieve legitimacy enhancing transparency in the process of custom, it must be acknowledged first that the power applied by international tribunals when they inaugurate new norms of customary international law always creates categories of "dominance" and "subservience", "inclusion" and "exclusion". Such an acknowledgement would foster a situation where both the power applied by tribunals and the manner in which it is applied, can legally be scrutinized for excesses that limit first the transparency of the process of custom, and second the legitimacy of norms of customary international law.

More from this author