Regular price €65.99
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
A01=Daniel Friedman
A01=Duncan James
A01=R. Mark Isaac
A01=Shyam Sunder
Aggregate Level Evidence
Author_Daniel Friedman
Author_Duncan James
Author_R. Mark Isaac
Author_Shyam Sunder
behavioural economics
Bernoulli Function
Bond Risk Premium
Broad Stock Market Index
Category=JMA
Category=KCA
Compound Lottery
Concave Utility Functions
CRRA
decision theory
Dominant Strategy Play
Dutch Auction
Economics
Elicitation Instruments
empirical models of risky choice
empirical validation
eq_bestseller
eq_business-finance-law
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Equity Premium Puzzle
Expected Utility Theorem
Intrinsic Preferences
Negative Relationship
Net Payoff
opportunity cost analysis
Opportunity Sets
Petersburg Paradox
Positive Mammography
Probability Weighting Functions
Random Cash Fl Ow
Risk Neutral Dm
Risk Neutrality
risk preference measurement
Risk Preference Parameters
Risky curves
Salivary Testosterone
Theory
Utility
Utility Function
utility function estimation
Wait Option

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138096462
  • Weight: 280g
  • Dimensions: 156 x 234mm
  • Publication Date: 25 May 2017
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

For several decades, the orthodox economics approach to understanding choice under risk has been to assume that each individual person maximizes some sort of personal utility function defined over purchasing power. This new volume contests that even the best wisdom from the orthodox theory has not yet been able to do better than supposedly naïve models that use rules of thumb, or that focus on the consumption possibilities and economic constraints facing the individual.

The authors assert this by first revisiting the origins of orthodox theory. They then recount decades of failed attempts to obtain meaningful empirical validation or calibration of the theory. Estimated shapes and parameters of the "curves" have varied erratically from domain to domain (e.g., individual choice versus aggregate behavior), from context to context, from one elicitation mechanism to another, and even from the same individual at different time periods, sometimes just minutes apart.

This book proposes the return to a simpler sort of scientific theory of risky choice, one that focuses not upon unobservable curves but rather upon the potentially observable opportunities and constraints facing decision makers. It argues that such an opportunities-based model offers superior possibilities for scientific advancement. At the very least, linear utility – in the presence of constraints - is a useful bar for the "curved" alternatives to clear.

Daniel Friedman is Distinguished Professor of Economics, University of California, Santa Cruz, USA R. Mark Isaac is John and Hallie Quinn Eminent Scholar at Florida State University, USA Duncan James is Associate Professor (Economics) Fordham University, USA Shyam Sunder is James L. Frank Professor of Economics and Management at the Yale School of Management.

More from this author