Russian Energy Strategy in the European Union, the Former Soviet Union Region, and China

Regular price €52.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Stylianos A. Sotiriou
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
Author_Stylianos A. Sotiriou
automatic-update
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=HBJD
Category=HBJF
Category=JPS
Category=NHD
Category=NHF
COP=United States
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
Energy politics
eq_bestseller
eq_history
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
European Studies
Language_English
PA=Available
Price_€20 to €50
PS=Active
Russia-EU relations
Russo-Chinese Relations
softlaunch

Product details

  • ISBN 9781498502337
  • Weight: 431g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 24 May 2016
  • Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Paperback
  • Language: English
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns
This book places Eurasia in its entirety within a single explanatory framework and examines, for the first time to that extent, Russia as a Eurasian energy power in its affairs with the two main geopolitical players of the region, the EU and China. Part of this geopolitical space is the Former Soviet Union (FSU) region which shares deep historical-political ties with Russia and constitutes the necessary crossing for the latter’s natural gas supplies en route to the EU market.In this way, an energy triangle is established, with Russia at the top angle, the EU in the left angle, China in the right angle and the FSU region the median.Following the scheme, three bipolar relationships emerge, Russia-FSU region, Russia-EU and Russia-China, with each of them representing a different type of bilateral cooperation. In the first case there is an asymmetric relationship with one actor being overly powerful, in terms of energy, to impose its conditions, economic and political, on the other. In the second case there is a symmetric relationship with both actors having equal means of pressure at their disposal. Finally, in the third case there is balanced relationship with both actors trading on an equal basis. Within this framework, one of the dominant theoretical debates in the field of International Relations, that between Neorealism and Neoliberal Institutionalism (the so-called ‘Neo-Neo’ debate) seeks to shed light on the governing rationale beyond Putin’s Russia foreign energy policy vis-à-vis the FSU region, the EU and China.
Stylianos A. Sotiriou is lecturer at the International Hellenic University.

More from this author