Sartre, Foucault, and Historical Reason, Volume Two

Regular price €92.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Thomas R. Flynn
absurdism
authenticity
Author_Thomas R. Flynn
Category=QDH
conquest
culture
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
ethics
existentialism
experience
foucault
government
hierarchy
historical nominalism
historiography
human nature
knowledge
meaning
metaphysics
modernity
nonfiction
ontology
philosophy
poststructuralism
power
purpose
rationality
reason
sartre
space
subjectivity
truth
violence

Product details

  • ISBN 9780226254708
  • Weight: 652g
  • Dimensions: 17 x 24mm
  • Publication Date: 15 Feb 2005
  • Publisher: The University of Chicago Press
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns
Sartre and Foucault were two of the most prominent and at times mutually antagonistic philosophical figures of the twentieth century. And nowhere are the antithetical natures of their existentialist and poststructuralist philosophies more apparent than in their disparate approaches to historical understanding. In Volume One of this authoritative two-volume study, Thomas R. Flynn conducted a pivotal and comprehensive reconstruction of Sartrean historical theory. This long-awaited second volume offers a comprehensive and critical reading of the Foucauldian counterpoint.

A history, theorized Foucault, should be a kind of map, a comprehensive charting of structural transformations and displacements over time. Contrary to other Foucault scholars, Flynn proposes an "axial" rather than a developmental reading of Foucault's work. This allows aspects of Foucault's famous triad of knowledge, power, and the subject to emerge in each of his major works. Flynn maps existentialist categories across Foucault's "quadrilateral," the model that Foucault proposes as defining modernist conceptions of knowledge. At stake is the degree to which Sartre's thought is fully captured by this mapping, whether he was, as Foucault claimed, "a man of the nineteenth century trying to think in the twentieth."

More from this author