Scepticism

Regular price €173.60
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Arne Naess
Author_Arne Naess
Category=GBC
Category=QDHR
Category=QDTK
dialectical reasoning
Empirical Semantics
epistemology
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
Evidence Requirements
Explicit Conceptual Frameworks
General Fallibility
Gordon Allport
Hellenic Sceptic
Incorrigibility Claim
incorrigible
Incorrigible Statements
Knowledge Expressions
mature
Mature Sceptic
Metabasis Eis Allo Genos
Past Tense
Phlegmatic Man
Positive Mental Health
psychological scepticism
Pyrrho's Scepticism
Pyrrhonian philosophy
Pyrrho’s Scepticism
Quod Nihil Scitur
rationality of Pyrrhonism debate
Sceptical Bent
Sceptical Phrases
semantics in philosophy
Sextus Empiricus
Sextus Empiricus studies
Sextus's Pyrrhonism
Sextus’s Pyrrhonism
statements
Truth Requirement
Verbal Conformity
Verbalizable Envisaging
Vice Versa
Young Man

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138904194
  • Weight: 408g
  • Dimensions: 156 x 234mm
  • Publication Date: 21 May 2015
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Originally published in 1968. Scepticism is generally regarded as a position which, if correct, would be disastrous for our everyday and scientific beliefs. According to this view, a sceptical argument is one that leads to the intuitively false conclusion that we cannot know anything. But there is another, much neglected and more radical form of scepticism, Pyrrhonism, which neither denies nor accepts the possibility of knowledge and is to be regarded not as a philosophical position so much as the expression of a philosophical way of life. Professor Naess argues that, given a sympathetic interpretation, Sextus Empiricus’s outline of Pyrrhonian scepticism provides the essentials of a genuine and rational sceptical point of view. He begins with a brief account of Pyrrhonism, then goes on to argue for the psychological possibility of this kind of scepticism, defending it against common objections, and examining some of its implications. The last two chapters provide detailed support for the rationality of Pyrrhonism, drawing mainly on certain methodological distinctions in semantics which both justify the Pyrrhonist’s failure to make assertions and restrict the scope of recent epistemological arguments against scepticism in such a way as to modify severely the conclusions based on them.

More from this author