Scientific Irrationalism

Regular price €63.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=David Stove
A01=Keith Windschuttle
Additional Premise
Author_David Stove
Author_Keith Windschuttle
British Journal
Category=JBCC
Category=PDA
Category=QDHR
Contingent Propositions
critique of Kuhn and Popper
David Stove
Epistemic Context
epistemology methods
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_science
eq_society-politics
Essential Auxiliary
Hume's Argument
Hume's Inductive Scepticism
Incurable Invalidity
inductive
Inductive Argument
Inductive Probabilist
Inductive Scepticism
Irrationalist Philosophy
Irrationalist Thesis
James Franklin
Jazz Age
Keith Windschuttle
Kepler's Laws
Logical Expressions
Logical Relation
MIT Press
Newtonian Physics
Non-deductive Logic
Objective Bayesians
philosophy of science
Popper's Philosophy
postmodern critique
rationality in research
Resemblance Thesis
scepticism
science studies debate
scientific reasoning
Suggestio Falsi
Volitional Contexts

Product details

  • ISBN 9781412806466
  • Weight: 317g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 30 Oct 2006
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Inc
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Little known outside his native Australia, David Stove was one of the most illuminating and brilliant philosophical essayists of his era. A fearless attacker of intellectual and cultural orthodoxies, Stove left powerful critiques of scientific irrationalism, Darwinian theories of human behavior, and philosophical idealism.

Since its inception in the 1940s, the field of science studies, originally intended to bridge the gap between science and the humanities, has been the center of controversy and debate. The most notable figures in this debate are Thomas Kuhn and Karl Popper. In Scientific Irrationalism, now available in paperback, David Stove demonstrates how extravagant has been the verbiage wasted on this issue and how irrational the combatants have been. He shows that Kuhn and Popper share considerable common ground. Stove argues that the problems all reside in the reasoning of the critics. He identifies the logical mistakes and conceptual allusions made by Kuhn and Popper and their supporters, as well as their collective dependency on a single argument made by the philosopher of the Scottish Enlightenment, David Hume. He then demonstrates how little potency that argument actually has for the claims of science.

In his foreword, Keith Windschuttle explains the debate surrounding the field of science studies and explores David Stove's contribution as well as his lack of recognition. In an afterword, James Franklin discusses reactions to Stove's work.

More from this author