Sign of Pathology

Regular price €33.99
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
A01=Nathan Stormer
abortion and the state
abortion history
Abortion Rhetoric
American intellectual history
Author_Nathan Stormer
Biopower Medicine
Category=CFG
culture wars history
eq_bestseller
eq_dictionaries-language-reference
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
family state and reproduction
gender and medicine
history of abortion in America
history of reproductive medicine
history of women's health
medical discourse
medical humanities
medicalization of abortion
medicine and morality
Pathology Memory Studies
reproductive health history
reproductive politics
reproductive rights history
rhetoric of medicine
social history
U.S. social history
women's bodies in medicine

Product details

  • ISBN 9780271065564
  • Weight: 386g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 15 Sep 2016
  • Publisher: Pennsylvania State University Press
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Much of the political polarization that grips the United States is rooted in the so-called culture wars, and no topic defines this conflict better than the often contentious and sometimes violent debate over abortion rights. In Sign of Pathology, Nathan Stormer reframes our understanding of this conflict by examining the medical literature on abortion from the 1800s to the 1960s.

Often framed as an argument over a right to choose versus a right to life, our current understanding of this conflict is as a contest over who has the better position on reproductive biology. Against this view, Sign of Pathology argues that, as it became a medical problem, abortion also became a template, more generally, for struggling with how to live—far exceeding discussions of the merits of providing abortions or how to care for patients. Abortion practices (and all the legal, moral, and ideological entanglements thereof) have rested firmly at the center of debate over many fundamental institutions and concepts—namely, the individual, the family, the state, human rights, and, indeed, the human. Medical rhetoric, then, was decisive in cultivating abortion as a mode of cultural critique, even weaponizing it for discursive conflict on these important subjects, although the goal of the medical practice of abortion has never been to establish this kind of struggle. Stormer argues that the medical discourse of abortion physicians transformed the state of abortion into an indicator that the culture was ill, attacking itself during and through pregnancy in a wrongheaded attempt to cope with reproduction.

Nathan Stormer is Mark and Marcia Bailey Professor of Communication and Journalism at the University of Maine.

More from this author