Skeptical Invariantism Reconsidered

Regular price €51.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
Alexander Dinges
Annalisa Coliva
assertion
Bank Case
Category=QDTK
Christos Kyriacou
Closure Principles
Competent Deduction
Cumulative Case Argument
Davide Fassio
Duncan Pritchard
Eleonora Cresto
Epistemic Contextualism
Epistemic Evaluation
epistemic justification
Epistemic Position
Epistemic Practices
Epistemic Probability
Epistemic Standard
epistemic variantism
epistemology
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
Error Possibilities
Error Theory
externalism
fallibilism
Gettier Cases
Herman Cappelen
hinge epistemology
infallibilism
Intellectual Virtues
internalism
Kevin Wallbridge
knowledge
Knowledge Ascriptions
Knowledge Claims
knowledge standards
Krista Lawlor
Loose Talk
Michael Blome-Tillmann
Michael Hannon
Mona Simion
Nevin Climenhaga
Ordinary Empirical Propositions
philosophy of language
practical reasoning
Practical Stakes
pragmatic skepticism
Radical Sceptical Hypotheses
Radical Skepticism
Radical Skeptics
Robin McKenna
semantic analysis of skepticism
Skeptical Argument
skeptical invariantism
skepticism
Testimonial Knowledge
Vice Versa
Wayne A. Davis

Product details

  • ISBN 9781032027463
  • Weight: 500g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
  • Publication Date: 27 May 2024
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

This collection of original essays explores the topic of skeptical invariantism in theory of knowledge. It eschews historical perspectives and focuses on this traditionally underexplored, semantic characterization of skepticism.

The book provides a carefully structured, state-of-the-art overview of skeptical invariantism and offers up new questions and avenues for future research. It treats this semantic form of skepticism as a serious position rather than assuming that skepticism is false and attempting to diagnose where arguments for skepticism go wrong. The essays take up a wide range of different philosophical perspectives on three key questions in the debate about skeptical invariantism: (1) whether the standards for knowledge vary, (2) how demanding the standards for knowledge are, and (3) whether the kind of evidence, reasons, methods, processes, etc. that we can bring to bear are sufficient to meet those standards.

Skeptical Invariantism Reconsidered will be of interest to scholars and advanced students in epistemology and the philosophy of language.

Christos Kyriacou is a Lecturer at the University of Cyprus and received his PhD in Philosophy from the University of Edinburgh. His main interests lie in epistemology, metaethics, and their intersection.

Kevin Wallbridge works on issues in epistemology, the philosophy of language, and the philosophy of mind. He has been a Lecturer at the University of Southampton and a postdoctoral research fellow at the University of Cyprus. His PhD in Philosophy is from the University of Edinburgh.