Slavery's End in Tennessee

Regular price €28.50
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=John Cimprich
Abraham Lincoln
Alabama
Author_John Cimprich
Category=NHK
Category=NHTS
civil war
confederacy
confederate states of America
cotton
CSA
enslaved people
eq_bestseller
eq_history
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
fiction
Gettysburg
jefferson davis
military history
Nineteenth century
novel
prose
secession
slavery
southern history
war between the states
white supremacy

Product details

  • ISBN 9780817311834
  • Weight: 333g
  • Dimensions: 137 x 206mm
  • Publication Date: 01 Oct 2002
  • Publisher: The University of Alabama Press
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns
This is the first book-length work on wartime race relations in Tennessee, and it stresses the differences within the slave community as well as Military Governor Andrew Johnson\u2019s role in emancipation. In Tennessee a significant number of slaves took advantage of the disruptions resulting from federal invasion to escape servitude and to seek privileges enjoyed by whites. Some rushed into theses changes, believing God had ordained them; others acted simply from a willingness to seize any opportunity for improving their lot. Both groups felt a sense of dignity that their slaves initiated a change; they lacked the power and resources to secure and expand the gains they made on their own. Because most disloyal slaves supported the Union while most white Tennesseans did not, the federal army eventually decided to encourage and capitalize upon slave discontent. Idealistic Northern reformers simultaneously worked to establish new opportunities for Southern blacks. The reformers\u2019 paternalistic attitudes and the army\u2019s concern with military expediency limited the aid they extended to blacks. Black poverty, white greed, and white racial prejudice severely restricted change, particularly in the former slaves\u2019 economic position. The more significant changes took the form of new social privileges for the freedmen: familial security, educational opportunities, and religious independence. Masters had occasionally granted these benefits to some slaves, but what the disloyal slaves wanted and won was the formalization of these privileges for all blacks in the state.
John Cimprich is Assistant Professor of History, Southeast Missouri State University.

More from this author