Social Welfare and the Failure of the State
Regular price
€44.99
A01=Roger Hadley
A01=Stephen Hatch
alternative welfare provision structures
Area Teams
Author_Roger Hadley
Author_Stephen Hatch
Cambridge University
Category=JBF
Category=JKS
Category=JKSN
Central Government
Centralist Faith
Collectivism
collectivism in Britain
Commercial Enterprises
Countesthorpe College
Democracy
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Failure of the State
Freed Women
GNP
Good Life
Keynes
Larger Families
Local Authority Social Services Departments
Local Government Operational Research Unit
National Women's Aid Federation
National Women’s Aid Federation
Neighbourhood Council
Participatory
participatory governance models
Patch Leaders
Personal Social Services
public policy analysis
Purposive Social Change
Reorganisation
Representative Democracy
Seebohm Committee
Self-help Centre
Social
Social Democracy
Social Democratic State
Social Policy
social service administration
Social Services
Social Services Area Team
Social Welfare
Sociology
Standard Quality Services
statutory service reform
Statutory Services
Stephen Hatch
Voluntary Organisations
Welfare
Welfare Services
welfare state critique
Wider Issues
Product details
- ISBN 9781138611221
- Weight: 453g
- Dimensions: 138 x 216mm
- Publication Date: 15 Aug 2020
- Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
- Publication City/Country: GB
- Product Form: Paperback
Secure
checkout
Fast Shipping
Easy returns
Originally published in 1981 Social Welfare and the Failure of the State looks at how the 1980s have ushered in an intensification on the debate of the role of the state in social welfare. The book highlights the trends towards centralisation in modern Britain and then provides a critical argument on to new ground. It highlights the trends towards centralisation in modern Britain and then provides a critical analysis of the growth of the social services in the 1960s and 1970s. But its target is the way these services were provided, not the amount of money spent on them. The authors argue that they have grown in the wrong direction.
