Socialist Welfare in a Market Economy

Regular price €44.99
Quantity:
Ships in 10-20 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
Shipping & Delivery
A01=Nelson Chow
A01=Yeubin Xu
A01=Yongxin Zhou
Author_Nelson Chow
Author_Yeubin Xu
Author_Yongxin Zhou
Average Local Wage
Category=JB
Category=JKS
CCP
Central Government
Chinese labour reform
Contribution Rate
Contribution Years
economic restructuring China
Economy
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Formal Employees
Guangzhou
Guangzhou Government
Individual Account Pension
Labour Department
Labour Service Companies
Market
Nelson Chow
Non-public Sector
Pension Pools
Pension Reforms
Pension System
pension system China
Planned Economy Era
Re-employment Service
Re-employment Service Centres
Retirement Benefits
Social Pool
Social Security Ministry
social security reform case study
Socialism
SOE
SOEs Reform
State Council Document
state-owned enterprise transition
Unemployment Insurance
Unemployment Insurance Funds
unemployment insurance policy
welfare policy analysis
Yeubin Xu

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138716971
  • Weight: 453g
  • Dimensions: 152 x 219mm
  • Publication Date: 11 Nov 2019
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Paperback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

This title was first published in 2001. Using the city of Guangzhou as a case study, this text looks at how China has adopted a market economy, whilst still maintaining state-owned enterprises and an all-embracing social security system which protects the majority of Chinese workers. This volume examines three questions: can socialist social welfare co-exist with the market economy?; can state-owned enterprises survive in a market economy?; and has China succeeded in creating a market economy without sacrificing its socialist ideals? The study demonstrates that compromises have been necessary to accomodate both socialist and market objectives. continuing to support workers with social security benefits has, for example, made enterprises less competitive, and disparities in benefits arise as workers are allowed to supplement the minimum guaranteed income through savings in individual accounts.

Yongxin Zhou, Nelson Chow, Yeubin Xu

More from this author