Spinoza’s Argument for Substance Monism

Regular price €82.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Christopher Martin
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
attributes
Author_Christopher Martin
automatic-update
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=HP
Category=HPJ
Category=JFCX
Category=QDHR
Category=QDTJ
causation
COP=United States
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
early modern philosophy
early modern studies
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
Language_English
metaphysics
modern philosophy
modes
ontological argument
PA=Available
Price_€50 to €100
PS=Active
seventeenth-century philosophy
softlaunch
speculative metaphysics
Spinoza
substance monism

Product details

  • ISBN 9781666927146
  • Weight: 390g
  • Dimensions: 158 x 237mm
  • Publication Date: 15 Nov 2023
  • Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Hardback
  • Language: English
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns
In Spinoza’s Argument for Substance Monism: Why There Is Only One Thing, Christopher Martin provides an interpretation and defense of this argument, using speculative metaphysics as a method to show how the key terms and concepts are employed and fit together. Specifically, Martin argues that (i) Spinoza’s understanding of substance and attribute departs only slightly from dominant historic notions; (ii) his definition of God in terms of attributes instead of perfections is quite helpful and (mostly) compatible with more traditional definitions; and (iii) Spinoza’s pairing of causal and conceptual relations is more intuitive than we think. Martin also shows how these essences function as causes and explains why, with Spinoza’s understanding of emanation and conceptual independence, any substance must have every attribute. These features of Spinoza’s argument explain and defend his ultimate claim that God/Nature is the only substantial being in existence. This book demonstrates how approachable and compelling Spinoza’s argument is and illustrates the practice and potential of speculative metaphysics for specialists and non-specialists alike.
Christopher Martin is associate professor of philosophy at the University of Toledo.

More from this author