A01=John J. Dinan
amendment
Author_John J. Dinan
bear arms
budget
Category=JPH
Category=JPR
Category=LNDU
Category=LNDV
Category=LNDX
civil liberties
congress
constitution
courts
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
equal protection
executive power
federal
government
gun rights
history
legal system
legalization
legislation
litigation
marijuana
minimum wage
nonfiction
politics
public policy
ratification
religious liberty
social change
spending
state
supreme court
taxes
Product details
- ISBN 9780226532783
- Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
- Publication Date: 05 Apr 2018
- Publisher: The University of Chicago Press
- Publication City/Country: US
- Product Form: Hardback
Secure
checkout
Fast Shipping
Easy returns
Since the US Constitution came into force in 1789, it has been amended just twenty-seven times, with ten of those amendments coming in the first two years following ratification. By contrast, state constitutions have been completely rewritten on a regular basis, and the current documents have been amended on average 150 times. This is because federal amendments are difficult, so politicians rarely focus on enacting them. Rather, they work to secure favorable congressional statutes or Supreme Court decisions. By contrast, the relative ease of state amendment processes makes them a realistic and regular vehicle for seeking change. With State Constitutional Politics, John Dinan looks at the various occasions in American history when state constitutional amendments have served as instruments of governance. Among other things, amendments have constrained state officials in the way they levy taxes and spend money; enacted policies unattainable through legislation on issues ranging from minimum wage to the regulation of marijuana; and updated understandings of rights, including religious liberty, equal protection, and the right to bear arms. In addition to comprehensively chronicling the ways amendments shape politics in the states, Dinan also assesses the consequences of undertaking changes in governance through amendments rather than legislation or litigation. For various reasons, including the greater stability and legitimacy of changes achieved through the amendment process, he argues that it might be a more desirable way of achieving change.
John Dinan is professor of politics and international affairs at Wake Forest University and the author of several books, including The American State Constitutional Tradition.
