Strategies of Ambiguity in Ancient Literature

Regular price €194.06
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
automatic-update
B01=Martin Vöhler
B01=Stavros Frangoulidis
B01=Therese Fuhrer
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=DSBB
COP=Germany
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
eq_bestseller
eq_biography-true-stories
eq_isMigrated=0
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
Language_English
PA=Available
Price_€100 and above
PS=Active
softlaunch
Storungstaktiken

Product details

  • ISBN 9783110715415
  • Weight: 745g
  • Dimensions: 155 x 230mm
  • Publication Date: 22 Feb 2021
  • Publisher: De Gruyter
  • Publication City/Country: DE
  • Product Form: Hardback
  • Language: English
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

Ambiguity in the sense of two or more possible meanings is considered to be a distinctive feature of modern art and literature. It characterizes the "open artwork" (Eco) and is generated by "disruptive tactics" (Wellershoff) and strategies to engender uncertainty. While ambiguity is seen as a "paradigm of modernity" (Bode), there is skepticism regarding its use in the pre-modern era. Older studies were dominated by the conviction that there was a lack of ambiguity in pre-modernity because, according to the rules of the "old rhetoric", ambiguity was seen as an avoidable error (vitium) and a violation of the dictate of clarity (perspicuitas).

The aim of the volume is to re-examine the putative "absence of ambiguity" in the pre-modern era. Is it not possible to find clear examples of deliberately employed (intended) ambiguity in antiquity? Are the oracles and riddles, the Palinode of Stesichoros and Socrates (Phaedrus), the dissoi logoi of rhetoric, the ambiguities of the tragedies all exceptions or do they not indicate a distinct interest in the artistic use of ambiguity?

The presentations of the conference, which will include scholars from various philologies, will combine a recourse to theoretical concepts of intended ambiguity with exemplary analyses from the field of pre-modern art and literature.

M. Vöhler and S. Frangoulidis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece; T. Fuhrer, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Germany.