A01=Morris Lazerowitz
Abstract Words
analytic philosophy
Author_Morris Lazerowitz
Category=QD
Category=QDTJ
causes of philosophical theory adherence
Conclusive Establishment
Conclusive Verification
Empirical Proposition
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
Infinite Geometric Series
Iron Anvil
logical analysis
Logically Impossible
Mental Inability
Mental Quickness
Metaphysical Sentences
Moore's Demonstrations
Moore's Paradox
Moore's Refutations
Moore’s Demonstrations
Moore’s Paradox
Moore’s Refutations
Philosophical Creed
philosophical language analysis
philosophical paradoxes
Priori Proposition
Priori True Proposition
Self-contradictory Appearance
Self-contradictory Expressions
Self-contradictory Sentences
Strongly Verifiable
Subject Predicate Sentences
Suprasensible Reality
universals debate
Universals Whiteness
Unknowable Substrata
verification theory
Weakly Verifiable
Product details
- ISBN 9780415614269
- Weight: 540g
- Dimensions: 138 x 216mm
- Publication Date: 09 Nov 2010
- Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
- Publication City/Country: GB
- Product Form: Paperback
Secure
checkout
Fast Shipping
Easy returns
This is Volume II of five in a series on Epistemology and Metaphysics. Originally published in 1955, this text has main areas: that change which has come over philosophy as we have come to realize how very strange philosophical questions are and presents a certain new view of philosophy and its associated new philosophical procedure; second, it presents typical philosophical disputes and illustrates the new procedure, asking what has led philosophers to say the extraordinary things they have said. At this stage the study aims to carry this inquiry only far enough to reveal some of the confusions, excuses and reasons behind philosophical doctrines. Finally, the inquiry is carried further and submits that there are often causes for adherence to a philosophical theory, deeper than those which appear when we ask the reasons for the theory. In illustration of this it ventures in outline a surmise as to one of the deeper sources which lie behind the old and phoenix-like paradox ‘Change is unreal’.
