Subjectivity

Regular price €112.99
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A32=Amy Gilbert Richards
A32=Christopher O. Tollefsen
A32=Elizabeth A. Murray
A32=Lee Trepanier
A32=Mark Shiffman
A32=Matthew B. O'Brien
A32=Sherif Girgis
A32=Steven F. McGuire
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
ancient philosophy
Aristotle
automatic-update
B01=R. J. Snell
B01=Steven F. McGuire
Bernard Lonergan
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=HP
Category=HPJ
Category=QD
Category=QDH
Category=QDTJ
COP=United States
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
epistemology
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
Eric Voegelin
Language_English
metaphysics
modern philosophy
new natural law
PA=Available
phenomenology of consciousness
political philosophy
Price_€100 and above
PS=Active
softlaunch
Thomas Aquinas
thumos

Product details

  • ISBN 9781498513180
  • Weight: 572g
  • Dimensions: 158 x 239mm
  • Publication Date: 04 Mar 2016
  • Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
  • Publication City/Country: US
  • Product Form: Hardback
  • Language: English
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

In Subjectivity, sixteen leading scholars examine the turn to the subject in modern philosophy and consider its historical antecedents in ancient and medieval thought. Some critics of modernity reject the turn to the subject as a specifically modern error, arguing that it logically leads to nihilism and moral relativism by divorcing the human mind from objective reality. Yet, some important thinkers of the last half-century--including Leo Strauss, Eric Voegelin, John Finnis, and Bernard Lonergan--consider a subjective starting point and claim to find a similar position in ancient and medieval thought. If correct, their positions suggest that one can adopt the subjective turn and remain true to the tradition.

This is a timely question. The common good of our polity encounters a situation in which many believe that there is no objective reality to which human minds and wills ought to conform, a conclusion that suggests we can define and construct reality. In light of this, the notion of a natural or objective reality to which human beings ought to conform becomes particularly vital. Should we, then, adopt the modern turn to subjectivity and argue for objective truth and moral order on its basis, or reject the subjective turn as part of the problem and return to an earlier approach that grounds these things in nature or some other external reality? Critics of modern subjectivity argue that the modern turn to subjectivity must be abandoned because it is the very source of the nominalism that threatens to undermine liberal democracy. Others argue, however, that subjectivity itself logically leads to the recognition of an objective reality beyond the mind of the individual. Edited by R. J. Snell and Steven F. McGuire, this collection will be of particular interest to intellectual historians, political philosophers, theologians, and philosophers.

R. J. Snell is professor of philosophy at Eastern University and executive director of the Agora Institute for Civic Virtue and the Common Good.

Steven F. McGuire is assistant professor of political science at Eastern University and a research director at the Agora Institute for Civic Virtue and the Common Good.