Talcott Parsons and the Conceptual Dilemma (RLE Social Theory)

Regular price €192.20
Quantity:
In stock with our UK publisher. 14-28 days
Delivery/Collection within 10-20 working days
14 days return policy Shipping & Delivery
A01=Hans Adriaansens
action
action systems
Actor's Subjective Orientation
advanced social theory analysis
Author_Hans Adriaansens
Category=JHBA
Conceptual Dilemma
conceptual scheme development
Conceptual Translation
epistemological analysis
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=1
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_society-politics
Fiduciary System
functional
general
General Action System
General Symbolic Medium
Intrinsic Basis
methodological
methodological frameworks
Methodological Premises
parsons's
Parsons's Action Theory
Parsons's Work
Parsons’s Work
Radical Rationalistic Positivism
Rational Pursuit
RLE
Social System
sociological theory
structural
Structural Functional Form
Structural Functional Theory
STRUCTURAL FUNCTIONAL VERSION
structural functionalism critique
Symbolic Medium
system
Theoretical Metamorphoses
Thomas's Schema
Utilitarian Dilemma
version
voluntaristic
Voluntaristic Action Theory
Voluntaristic Frame
Voluntaristic Pattern
Voluntaristic Theory
work

Product details

  • ISBN 9781138782617
  • Weight: 550g
  • Dimensions: 156 x 234mm
  • Publication Date: 08 Aug 2014
  • Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
  • Publication City/Country: GB
  • Product Form: Hardback
Secure checkout Fast Shipping Easy returns

This systematic analysis of the nature and development of Talcott Parson’s theory of action offers first an introduction to the conceptual paradigm upon which this theory is based – an introduction, that is, which will make Parson’s writing more easily accessible. Second, the book gives an explanation of the development which the action theory has undergone during the half-century of Parson’s career. Using a scheme of four theory-levels, the author indicates the crucial premises that can be distilled from Parson’s early works. He argues that Parsons, from the very start of his career, was trying to translate abstract premises into a systematically constructed conceptual scheme. The first conceptual translation, however, turned out to be vague and inconsistent in many respects, and this study offers a very specific explanation of the inadequacy of this first (structural-functional) version of the theory of action. Dr Adriaansens argues that it was not until Parsons had found his way out of this ‘conceptual dilemma’ that the premises of the action theory could be adequately translated into a conceptual paradigm.

More from this author