A01=Marcello Pera
Ad hoc hypothesis
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age of Enlightenment
Alessandro Volta
Ambiguity
Analogy
Anecdote
Atomism
Author_Marcello Pera
automatic-update
B06=Jonathan Mandelbaum
Bold hypothesis
Boredom
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=PSV
Category=PSVD
Chilblains
Constipation
COP=United States
Delivery_Pre-order
Electric fish
Electric motor
Electric power
Electricity
Electroscope
Electrostatic generator
Electrostatic induction
Electrostatics
Emergence
eq_bestseller
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
eq_science
Explanation
Francesco Algarotti
Francis Hauksbee
Gold leaf
Good faith
Great power
Hypothesis
I. Bernard Cohen
Imre Lakatos
Jan Ingenhousz
Jesse Ramsden
John Canton
Language_English
Larry Laudan
Leyden jar
Luigi Galvani
Normal conditions
Occam's razor
Orrery
PA=Temporarily unavailable
Paul Feyerabend
Perpetual motion
Perspiration
Phenomenon
Philosophical analysis
Philosophy
Physical law
Physicist
Price_€100 and above
PS=Active
Psychoanalysis
Rebuttal
Research program
Sciatica
Science
Scientific controversy
Scientific method
Scientific revolution
Scientist
Sealing wax
softlaunch
Suggestion
Superiority (short story)
Tetanus
The New Science
The Philosopher
Theory
Theory choice
Theory-ladenness
Therapeutic effect
Thomas Kuhn
Thought
Treatise
Ulrich
Voltaic pile
Product details
- ISBN 9780691633183
- Weight: 482g
- Dimensions: 152 x 229mm
- Publication Date: 19 Apr 2016
- Publisher: Princeton University Press
- Publication City/Country: US
- Product Form: Hardback
- Language: English
Secure
checkout
Fast Shipping
Easy returns
How do ideas become accepted by the scientific community? How and why do scientists choose among empirically equivalent theories? In this pathbreaking book translated from the Italian, Marcello Pera addresses these questions by exploring the politics, rhetoric, scientific practices, and metaphysical assumptions that entered into the famous Galvani-Volta controversy of the late eighteenth century. This lively debate erupted when two scientists, each examining the muscle contractions of a dissected frog in contact with metal, came up with opposing but experimentally valid explanations of the phenomenon. Luigi Galvani, a doctor and physiologist, believed that he had discovered animal electricity (electrical body fluid existing naturally in a state of disequilibrium), while the physicist Alessandro Volta attributed the contractions to ordinary physical electricity. Beginning with the electrical concepts understood by scientists in the 1790s, Pera traces the careers of Galvani and Volta and explains their laboratory procedures.
He shows that their controversy derived from two basic, irreducible interpretations of the proper nature of a common domain: Galvani saw the frog phenomenon as the work of biological organs, Volta as that of a physical apparatus. The initial preference for Volta's theory, maintains Pera, depended not on clear-cut methodological rules, but on a dialectical dispute for which the renowned physicist was better equipped, partly because he shared the dominant metaphysical views of his time. Originally published in 1991. The Princeton Legacy Library uses the latest print-on-demand technology to again make available previously out-of-print books from the distinguished backlist of Princeton University Press. These editions preserve the original texts of these important books while presenting them in durable paperback and hardcover editions. The goal of the Princeton Legacy Library is to vastly increase access to the rich scholarly heritage found in the thousands of books published by Princeton University Press since its founding in 1905.
