A01=Robert H. Frank
Age Group_Uncategorized
Age Group_Uncategorized
Austerity
Author_Robert H. Frank
automatic-update
Bidding
Budget
Bureaucrat
Category1=Non-Fiction
Category=KCA
Citizens United v. FEC
Competition
Consumer
Consumption (economics)
Consumption tax
COP=United States
Corruption
Cost-benefit analysis
Customer
Delivery_Delivery within 10-20 working days
Economic growth
Economic inequality
Economic surplus
Economics
Economist
Economy
Employment
eq_bestseller
eq_business-finance-law
eq_isMigrated=0
eq_isMigrated=2
eq_nobargain
eq_non-fiction
Expense
Externality
Financial crisis of 2007-08
Government spending
Government waste
Harm principle
Incentive
Income
Income tax
Institutional investor
Invisible hand
Language_English
Market failure
Microsoft
Negotiation
Occupational safety and health
PA=Available
Payment
Payroll tax
Perfect competition
Pollution
Positional good
Poverty
Prediction
Price_€10 to €20
Private sector
Productivity
Progressive tax
PS=Active
Public policy
Recession
Regulation
Retirement
Ronald Coase
Salary
Saving
Shortage
Skepticism
softlaunch
Supervisor
Tax
Tax cut
Tax policy
Tax rate
Tax revenue
The Wealth of Nations
Theft
Thought experiment
Tragedy of the commons
Transaction cost
Trickle-down economics
Unemployment
Wage
Welfare
Willingness to pay
Your Money
Product details
- ISBN 9780691156682
- Weight: 227g
- Dimensions: 140 x 216mm
- Publication Date: 16 Sep 2012
- Publisher: Princeton University Press
- Publication City/Country: US
- Product Form: Paperback
- Language: English
Secure
checkout
Fast Shipping
Easy returns
Who was the greater economist--Adam Smith or Charles Darwin? The question seems absurd. Darwin, after all, was a naturalist, not an economist. But Robert Frank, New York Times economics columnist and best-selling author of The Economic Naturalist, predicts that within the next century Darwin will unseat Smith as the intellectual founder of economics. The reason, Frank argues, is that Darwin's understanding of competition describes economic reality far more accurately than Smith's. And the consequences of this fact are profound. Indeed, the failure to recognize that we live in Darwin's world rather than Smith's is putting us all at risk by preventing us from seeing that competition alone will not solve our problems. Smith's theory of the invisible hand, which says that competition channels self-interest for the common good, is probably the most widely cited argument today in favor of unbridled competition--and against regulation, taxation, and even government itself. But what if Smith's idea was almost an exception to the general rule of competition? That's what Frank argues, resting his case on Darwin's insight that individual and group interests often diverge sharply.
Far from creating a perfect world, economic competition often leads to "arms races," encouraging behaviors that not only cause enormous harm to the group but also provide no lasting advantages for individuals, since any gains tend to be relative and mutually offsetting. The good news is that we have the ability to tame the Darwin economy. The best solution is not to prohibit harmful behaviors but to tax them. By doing so, we could make the economic pie larger, eliminate government debt, and provide better public services, all without requiring painful sacrifices from anyone. That's a bold claim, Frank concedes, but it follows directly from logic and evidence that most people already accept. In a new afterword, Frank further explores how the themes of inequality and competition are driving today's public debate on how much government we need.
Robert H. Frank is an economics professor at Cornell's Johnson Graduate School of Management, a regular "Economic View" columnist for the New York Times, and a Distinguished Senior Fellow at Demos. His books, which have been translated into twenty-two languages, include The Winner-Take-All Society (with Philip Cook), The Economic Naturalist, Luxury Fever, What Price the Moral High Ground?, and Principles of Economics (with Ben Bernanke).
